At least , based on spec  I would prefer LSI9265-8i as it supports hot spare, SSD support , cache and set it up in Raid 0 - but only in a replica 3 or replica 3 arbiter 1 volumes.

Best Regards,
Strahil Nikolov

В петък, 5 април 2019 г., 9:20:57 ч. Гринуич+3, Leo David <leoalex@gmail.com> написа:


Thank you Strahil for that.

On Fri, Apr 5, 2019, 06:45 Strahil <hunter86_bg@yahoo.com> wrote:

Adding Gluster users' mail list.

On Apr 5, 2019 06:02, Leo David <leoalex@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Any thoughts on this ?


On Wed, Apr 3, 2019, 17:02 Leo David <leoalex@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Everyone,
For a hyperconverged setup started with 3 nodes and going up in time up to 12 nodes, I have to choose between LSI2008 ( jbod ) and LSI9265 (raid).
Perc h710 ( raid ) might be an option too, but on a different chassis.
There will not be many disk installed on each node, so the replication will be replica 3 replicated-distribute volumes across the nodes as:
node1/disk1  node2/disk1  node3/disk1
node1/disk2  node2/disk2  node3/disk2
and so on...
As i will add nodes to the cluster ,  I intend expand the volumes using the same rule.
What would it be a better way,  to used jbod cards ( no cache ) or raid card and create raid0 arrays ( one for each disk ) and therefore have a bit of raid cache ( 512Mb ) ?
Is raid caching a benefit to have it underneath ovirt/gluster as long as I go for "Jbod"  installation anyway ?
Thank you very much !
--
Best regards, Leo David
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/6STI7U7LTOXSSH6WUNHX63WDIF2LZ46K/