On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com> wrote:The oVirt Project is pleased to announce the availability of the FirstRelease Candidate of oVirt 4.0.4 for testing, as of August 31st, 2016.Hi Sandro,does this mean that 4.0.3 was final, 2 days ago?I indeed noticed a strange subject in that e-mail[ANN] oVirt 4.0.3 Final Release Candidate is now availableThere were both "Final" and "Candidate" words ... and I was a bit confused...
Sorry, my copy / paste bad habit for announce emails...
Yes, it was final.
Also if this is true, any particular reason to have a new release candidate right 2 days after the previous final?Is it not too fast for users to stay ahead? Or do we need to consider "Release Candidate" phrase in a different way than usual?Only my opinion...
4.0.3 has been a short cycle release to fix some urgent bugs / regression on top of 4.0.2.
4.0.4 will have probably a longer cycle and even if we just released 4.0.3 GA, having fixed more than 100 bugs comparing to 4.0.3 seemed a good idea to issue a RC allowing people afflicted by those bugs to have a fix to test as soon as possible.
Gianluca
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
