10:54 p.m.
Can someonw clarify whether the DB will grow forever , if we never do a vacuum (either
with these commands or via the engine-upgrade)?
Best Regards,
Strahil NikolovOn Oct 14, 2019 17:03, Lucie Leistnerova <lleistne(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
On 10/14/19 3:36 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Lucie Leistnerova <lleistne(a)redhat.com> said:
>> Ah, you are right. dwh-vacuum was added in 4.2.
> Just for interest, I tried this on my 4.3.6 dev setup, and it just
> gives:
>
> [root@engine ~]# dwh-vacuum
> /usr/bin/dwh-vacuum: line 47: vacuumdb: command not found
>
> Looks like it needs the SCL enablement that engine-vacuum has.
My mistake, I thought it was fixed already but it was only for
engine-vacuum.
I've created new BZ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761494
Thanks for catching this!
--
Lucie Leistnerova
Senior Quality Engineer, QE Cloud, RHVM
Red Hat EMEA
IRC: lleistne @ #rhev-qe
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list -- users(a)ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives:
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/5WGD552G3GK...
2:08 a.m.
New subject: Clean up engine database?
On 10/15/19 5:54 AM, Strahil wrote:
Can someonw clarify whether the DB will grow forever , if we never do
a vacuum (either with these commands or via the engine-upgrade)?
The postgres database runs autovacuum regularly by default and engine
defines some vacuum variables in postgresql.conf to be more efficient.
Autovacuum runs standard vacuum (not FULL) and this can reclaim less space.
When you have smaller environment the grow of dwh database is not to
significant but with big setup it can be different. So is good to run
full vacuum in some time to reclaim more space. The thing is that this
takes a lot of time and tables are locked, so engine/dwh can't work with
them properly and need to be stopped.
Best Regards,
Strahil NikolovOn Oct 14, 2019 17:03, Lucie Leistnerova <lleistne(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>
> On 10/14/19 3:36 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
>> Once upon a time, Lucie Leistnerova <lleistne(a)redhat.com> said:
>>> Ah, you are right. dwh-vacuum was added in 4.2.
>> Just for interest, I tried this on my 4.3.6 dev setup, and it just
>> gives:
>>
>> [root@engine ~]# dwh-vacuum
>> /usr/bin/dwh-vacuum: line 47: vacuumdb: command not found
>>
>> Looks like it needs the SCL enablement that engine-vacuum has.
> My mistake, I thought it was fixed already but it was only for
> engine-vacuum.
> I've created new BZ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761494
>
> Thanks for catching this!
>
> --
> Lucie Leistnerova
> Senior Quality Engineer, QE Cloud, RHVM
> Red Hat EMEA
>
> IRC: lleistne @ #rhev-qe
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list -- users(a)ovirt.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)ovirt.org
> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
> oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
> List Archives:
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/5WGD552G3GK...
--
Lucie Leistnerova
Senior Quality Engineer, QE Cloud, RHVM
Red Hat EMEA
IRC: lleistne @ #rhev-qe
1648
days inactive
1648
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Lucie Leistnerova -
Strahil