
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 09:51:00AM +0200, Doron Fediuck wrote:
As for the copyrights mentioning, I think most people will approve copyrighting ovirt.org, rather than RedHat or IBM. This should prevent unneeded tension.
My memory of Red Hat practice is to let individual contributors decide, and in many cases we choose to put our own name in the copyright, possibly because it's fairest and clearest. That is, it wouldn't normally be a copyright attributed to Red Hat, but to some.developer@redhat.com. It sounds as if you are suggesting we assign copyright to oVirt, which doesn't make sense to me. oVirt isn't a legal entity that can hold a copyright. - Karsten -- name: Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Community Gardener team: Red Hat Community Architecture & Leadership uri: http://communityleadershipteam.org http://TheOpenSourceWay.org gpg: AD0E0C41