On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 19:52 +1000, Justin Clift wrote:
On 20/08/2012, at 10:02 PM, Mike Burns wrote:
Hi all,
Now that oVirt 3.1 has shipped, we need to start the planning process for the next release. One of the major topics for this week's weekly sync is to review the release criteria.
The criteria we used for 3.1 is laid out on the wiki [1]. I will be posting an equivalent version for the next release in the next couple days, but it will mostly be copy/paste from this page.
Please think about release criteria and whether or not we want to add/remove/change things for this release. This needs to be determined now to make sure that the release process runs smoother down the line.
Is there some way we can do an end-to-end platform test for most of the things mentioned there, to sanity check the binaries before announcement?
Trying to think of some way to catch the "broken ISO" problem that 3.1 has with NFS storage. So, something similar doesn't occur again in future.
Any ideas?
Yes, this makes a lot of sense to me. We should make an end-to-end sanity test with all components part of the release criteria. Mike
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
Thanks
Mike
[1] http://wiki.ovirt.org/wiki/Second_Release
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
-- Aeolus Community Manager http://www.aeolusproject.org
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users