[oVirt][Quantum] question about quantum CLI

Kris zhang zhang.kris at gmail.com
Wed Jun 13 04:31:26 UTC 2012


Hi Kotton,

In the file ovirt.sh, there is a line:

quantum update_port default $NET_UUID $PORT_UUID state=ACTIVE
                uuidgen > /tmp/network.$3.$4.port.attach
ATTACH_UUID=`cat /tmp/network.$3.$4.port.attach`


But i run this command, i found there is no any uuid generated, so what's
the value of the ATTACH_UUID?

Best regards,
Kris


On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Gary Kotton <gkotton at redhat.com> wrote:

> On 06/12/2012 12:36 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
>
>> On 06/12/2012 11:47 AM, Gary Kotton wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Kris,
>>> Thanks for the questions. Please see my inline answers. I have also
>>> cc'ed the ovirt arch mailing list.
>>> Thanks
>>> Gary
>>>
>>> On 06/12/2012 11:21 AM, Kris zhang wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Gkotton,
>>>>
>>>> I have some questions:
>>>>
>>>> 1) In the file "ovirt.sh", i found the command quantum always use the
>>>> tenant "default", so if the ovirt don't support multi-tenant?
>>>>
>>> oVirt does not support multi tenancy at the moment. Maybe there are
>>> people on the list who can provide more details about this. The initial
>>> plan was to use the "default" tenant.
>>>
>>
>> ovirt supports multiple users and an RBAC model for permissions between
>> these users.
>> what exactly are you looking for?
>>
> Quantum support multi tenancy. The integration with oVirt was done with
> the "default" tenant. This is a different model to that of oVirt.
> Thanks
> Gary
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/arch/attachments/20120613/3eaa5571/attachment.html>


More information about the Arch mailing list