[RFC] vdsm-bootstrap rewrite naming
Vinzenz Feenstra
vfeenstr at redhat.com
Tue Nov 13 17:18:23 UTC 2012
On 11/13/2012 05:21 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
> On 11/13/2012 01:52 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>> Hello All,
>>
>> I am working on rewriting the vdsm-bootstrap process.
>>
>> I found that most of the installer implementation is not vdsm
>> specific, so I split the package into two:
>>
>> core installer
>> vdsm-bootstrap
>>
>> I would like to find a suitable name for the core installer.
>>
>> In nat shell:
>> """
>> Standalone plugin based installation framework to be used to setup
>> system components. The plugin nature provides simplicity to
>> add new installation functionality without the complexity of the state
>> and transaction management.
>>
>> At the core of the implementation there is environment dictionary and
>> a flow of stages within plugins. The environment can be modified using
>> command-line parameters, configuration file, or dialog customization.
>> """
>>
>> Sources are available at temporary location[1].
>>
>> Names that we thought of:
>> 1. ovirt-installer
>
> hmmm, that's between being generic, and consumable by others.
> question is how problematic it is if we keep our name...
> would be nice if we can advertise ourselves a bit.
> maybe we can compromise on:
> ogi - ovirt generic installer
>
> so name isn't directly with ovirt, but some marketing of ovirt from it
> may happen.
>
> so +1 to OGI from me.
>
>> 2. virtulation (virtualization + installation)
>> 3. virtaller (virtualization + installation)
>> 4. TOPI (Task Oriented Pluggable Installer/Implementation)
>
> +1
>
> hmmm, spinning #1:
> OTOPI.
> has a nice ring to it around utopia as well.
>
>
>> 5. PDF (Pluggable Deployment Framework)
>
> -1 due to PDF so widely known as something else
>
>>
>> I would also like to consider if we want to keep the vdsm-bootstrap
>> name for the bootstrap package, or we should use something more
>> generic, as it really bootstrap the host and not vdsm...:
>> 1. ovirt-hypervisor-bootstrap
>> 2. ovirt-host-setup
>
> +1 to this one. not sure if critical to rename the rpm though.
+1 for this one
>
>> 3. ovirt-deployer
>>
>> Any other idea will be most welcome, we need to close this fast to
>> progress.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Alon Bar-Lev
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/alonbl/ovirt-installer
>> _______________________________________________
I would not call it just 'ovirt-installer' this is totally misleading.
Also the name play does not make sense.
If you want to give it some cosy name, go ahead, but 'ovirt-installer'
for example is counter intuitive and would suggest a full fledged
installation of the engine, node...
--
Regards,
Vinzenz Feenstra | Senior Software Engineer
RedHat Engineering Virtualization R & D
Phone: +420 532 294 625
IRC: vfeenstr or evilissimo
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
More information about the Arch
mailing list