the new oVirt website: live preview!
Mike Burns
mburns at redhat.com
Thu Sep 20 14:50:42 UTC 2012
On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 21:30 +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 02:27:28PM +0200, Garrett LeSage wrote:
> > On 09/20/2012 08:17 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
>
> > > The vertical spacing between 2 paragraphs or bulleted items looks a
> > >tad bit too large to my eye compared to the spacing between lines.
> >
> > I adjusted the spacing so that the line rhythm was maintained on the
> > page. It's especially needed on pages like:
> >
> > http://mediawiki-garrett.rhcloud.com/OVirt_3.1_release_notes
> > (Which is a copy/paste of the wiki text from the official oVirt wiki.)
> >
> > I will probably tweak the fonts and text a bit further, especially
> > when we have another reskinned instance of MediaWiki (containing all
> > of the content from wiki.ovirt.org) up and running.
>
> okay, well it's use one person feedback and i don't claim any
> UI sense :-) but again the space left between the last bullet of
> Installer section and the title of the Tools session looks quite large to
> my eye (I can put a finger between the bottom of the '(' and the top of
> the T here), vertical space is scarce especially on new screens :-\
>
> >
> > > The top page and the Download page don't even tell what licence
> > >is applicable, IMHO that crucial information should be presented to
> > >the user between the time it hits the home page and the time he's told
> > >how to install it on Fedora 17.
> >
> > That's a great point.
> >
> > Is it enough to mention "ASL2.0" in the footer and link to a
> > licensing page, like the current oVirt.org website does? Or should
> > we say more?
>
> Saying it's OpenSource under "ASL2.0" with a link is sufficient sure !
>
> thanks Garrett :-)
>
> Daniel
See other part of this thread -- we have projects in oVirt that are
*not* ASL 2.0. ovirt-node is GPL2 and content on the site and wiki are
something else as well, iirc.
Mike
>
>
More information about the Arch
mailing list