[Users] [Engine-devel] [Feedback required][host-deploy] Fedora-19 misses tar at minimal setup

Dan Kenigsberg danken at redhat.com
Tue Jul 30 21:40:29 UTC 2013


On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:09:47AM -0400, Antoni Segura Puimedon wrote:
> I would advocate for  option 2.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Michal Skrivanek" <michal.skrivanek at redhat.com>
> > To: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl at redhat.com>
> > Cc: "Juan Hernandez" <jhernand at redhat.com>, "engine-devel" <engine-devel at ovirt.org>, "arch" <arch at ovirt.org>, "users"
> > <users at ovirt.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 3:25:24 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] [Users] [Feedback required][host-deploy] Fedora-19	misses tar at minimal setup
> > 
> > 
> > On Jul 30, 2013, at 15:12 , Alon Bar-Lev <alonbl at redhat.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Hello All,
> > > 
> > > Starting the discussion again...
> > > 
> > > I would like to receive feedback regarding how we should cope with a state
> > > presented to use by Fedora.
> > > 
> > > Fedora-19 minimal setup does not install tar utility which is required to
> > > deploy files during the host-deploy process (Hosts->Add Host).
> > > 
> > > I guess because of 2.8M in size (including translations) -- a standard
> > > commonly used utility was removed.
> > 
> > How about filing bug on that? This is such a basic utility I can't imagine
> > anyone removing it.
> > 
> > > 
> > > There are three alternatives :
> > > 
> > > 1. Instruct users who are using minimal installations to manually install
> > > tar utility just like they configure repository, dns, etc..
> > > 
> > > Benefit: simplicity.
> > > Benefit: use standard tools.
> > > Benefit: lower payload to transmit.
> > > Drawback: require tar at destination machine.
> > > 
> > > 2. Do not use tar but self extracting python script, a patch is ready[1].
> > > 
> > > Benefit: ability to deploy environment in which tar is missing.
> > > Drawback: non standard tool at destination machine.
> > > Drawback: complexity within our code.

How about option 2.1: convince Fedora to reintroduce tar? It is ironic
that Gnome is shipped by default, but not such a staple utility.

Where in Fedora did this decision take place? Can it be undone?
Is it commonplace these days among other distros to boycot tar?

Dan.



More information about the Arch mailing list