What the new gerrit hoks will do
Alon Bar-Lev
alonbl at redhat.com
Wed Jul 31 10:29:14 UTC 2013
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ayal Baron" <abaron at redhat.com>
> To: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl at redhat.com>
> Cc: "David Caro" <dcaroest at redhat.com>, arch at ovirt.org
> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 1:23:39 PM
> Subject: Re: What the new gerrit hoks will do
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Ayal Baron" <abaron at redhat.com>
> > > To: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl at redhat.com>
> > > Cc: "David Caro" <dcaroest at redhat.com>, arch at ovirt.org
> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 1:05:27 PM
> > > Subject: Re: What the new gerrit hoks will do
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "David Caro" <dcaroest at redhat.com>
> > > > > To: "Itamar Heim" <iheim at redhat.com>
> > > > > Cc: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl at redhat.com>, arch at ovirt.org
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 11:01:20 AM
> > > > > Subject: Re: What the new gerrit hoks will do
> > > > >
> > > > > On 07/31/2013 09:24 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
> > > > > > On 07/31/2013 10:23 AM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Hi,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> I don't think it is good to have auto POST/MODIFIED.
> > > > > >> As there can be more than one patch per bug.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > i think post is still correct.
> > > > > > modified will only move if all patches with this bug-url are merged
> > > > > > iiuc.
> > > > > > a new patch with same bug-url will move the bug back to POST.
> > > > >
> > > > > Right, I forgot to clarify that only those bugs with all their
> > > > > external
> > > > > tracked patches closed will be changed to MODIFIED.
> > > >
> > > > And if it takes 3 or 4 weeks to post the other patch?
> > >
> > > If your patch does not solve the bug entirely then it should not have
> > > Bug-url, rather 'Related-To: XXXXXX
> > > And if this patch needs the others to complete the job then it should
> > > depend
> > > on them (i.e. patch set).
> > > Only the last patch should be marked with bug-url as only after it (and
> > > the
> > > patches it depends on) are merged the bug is really solved. The reason
> > > is
> > > that maintainer would do an even worse job than this script in tracking
> > > whether all patches required for solving a bug have been merged.
> >
> > Related-To are other bugs and changes that are related to the actual
> > fixing.
>
> Exactly, if a fix isn't solving the bug entirely but is related to it then it
> should have 'Related-To'.
>
> > A fix can have many components and can be broken into smaller parts to ease
> > review or even because it is split between deferent repositories.
> > It also need to pull some other unrelated patches to ease rebasing.
> > And finally, we are humans, and we do not always know that whatever we are
> > doing is correct and last.
>
> Not sure how all this is related to what I said. There are definitely cases
> where you want to write multiple patches to solve an issue, that is indeed
> the use case we are discussing here.
> The process is very simple, makes maintainer's life simpler and reduces
> chances of error, plus allows for automating things:
> If you have a bug which you solve in a series of patches then you make a
> patch set where only the last patch (which is dependent on the rest) is
> marked with Bug-Url and all the other patches have 'Related-To'. This way
> all the confusion and errors that you discussed before disappear.
I disagree but I will stop here.
Just to fix, once again, a misconception that is spread around this project.
"makes maintainer's" - maintainer != anyone who fix bugs nor whoever has commit access.
>
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Alon
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > >>> From: "David Caro" <dcaroest at redhat.com>
> > > > > >>> To: arch at ovirt.org
> > > > > >>> Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 10:02:46 PM
> > > > > >>> Subject: What the new gerrit hoks will do
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Hi all!
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> As promised here's an explanation of what the hooks will take
> > > > > >>> care
> > > > > >>> of:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> When a patch is submitted:
> > > > > >>> If the commit message has Bug-Url tag:
> > > > > >>> - for each Bug-Url:
> > > > > >>> * Check that the bug is public
> > > > > >>> * Add an external tracker to the patch if not there
> > > > > >>> already
> > > > > >>> * Move the bug status to POST
> > > > > >>> - Report back the result of all the previous actions
> > > > > >>> - Review with +1 if the bug was public, -1 if it was private
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> When a comment is added:
> > > > > >>> If the "Rerun-Hooks: all" line was added:
> > > > > >>> - Rerun all the hooks that ran when the hook was submitted
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> When a patch is submitted:
> > > > > >>> If the commit message has Bug-Url:
> > > > > >>> - For each Bug-Url:
> > > > > >>> * Check if the product for the bug is correct
> > > > > >>> * If it was, move the bug status to MODIFIED
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Keep in mind that this is a first step towards automation of the
> > > > > >>> whole
> > > > > >>> process.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Also, as always any input, ideas, or even complaints are welcome
> > > > > >>> :)
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> pd. Yes I will add this and more info to the wiki as soon as I
> > > > > >>> have
> > > > > >>> some
> > > > > >>> spare time to do it.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> --
> > > > > >>> David Caro
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Red Hat Czech s.r.o.
> > > > > >>> Continuous Integration Engineer - EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Tel.: +420 532 294 605
> > > > > >>> Email: dcaro at redhat.com
> > > > > >>> Web: www.cz.redhat.com
> > > > > >>> Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 99/71, 612 45, Brno, Czech
> > > > > >>> Republic
> > > > > >>> RHT Global #: 82-62605
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> _______________________________________________
> > > > > >>> Arch mailing list
> > > > > >>> Arch at ovirt.org
> > > > > >>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > > > >> Arch mailing list
> > > > > >> Arch at ovirt.org
> > > > > >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > David Caro
> > > > >
> > > > > Red Hat Czech s.r.o.
> > > > > Continuous Integration Engineer - EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D
> > > > >
> > > > > Tel.: +420 532 294 605
> > > > > Email: dcaro at redhat.com
> > > > > Web: www.cz.redhat.com
> > > > > Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 99/71, 612 45, Brno, Czech Republic
> > > > > RHT Global #: 82-62605
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Arch mailing list
> > > > Arch at ovirt.org
> > > > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
More information about the Arch
mailing list