oVirt 3.4 planning

[Itamar Heim]

On 10/31/2013 12:40 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:10:20PM +0200, Itamar Heim wrote:
>> On 10/31/2013 11:36 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 07:46:57PM +0200, Itamar Heim wrote:
>>>> To try and improve 3.4 planning over the wiki approach in 3.3, I've
>>>> placed the items i collected on users list last time into a google
>>>> doc[1]
>>>>
>>>> now, the main thing each item needs is a requirements owner, devel
>>>> owner and a testing owner (well, devel owner is really needed to
>>>> make it happen, but all are important).
>>>>
>>>> then we need an oVirt BZ for each, and for some a feature page.
>>>>
>>>> I also added columns indicating if the item will require an API
>>>> design review and a GUI design review.
>>>>
>>>> this list is just the start of course for items from it to get
>>>> ownership. i expect more items will be added as well, as long as
>>>> they have owners, etc.
>>>>
>>>> the doc is public read-only, please request read-write access to be
>>>> able to edit it.
>>>>
>>>> feel free to ask questions, etc.
>>>
>>> I'd love to add vdsm-reg phase-out to the list. It's a code-only change,
>>> but it requires tracking.
>>>
>>>      Bug 994451 - [vdsm-reg] retire vdsm-reg
>>
>> I think its clear its deprecated, but need to remain until we move
>> to "4.0" when a lot of other things to be deprecated are ready.
>
> It's still in use today, when a node registers itself to
> ovirt-engine-3.3. We should replace it with a much simpler http call,
> and keep vdsm-reg optional for the (very) few users who would like to
> register an ovirt-node-3.4 to an engine <= 3.1.
>
>>
>>>
>>> Another one on my wishlist is per-network custom properties and hooks.
>>> Having something like that would enable users do all kind of funky
>>> network configurations that are currently unsupported by oVirt.
>>
>> well, please add to the google doc...
>
> Would you grant me (actually danken at gmail) write access? Or better
> move the list the wiki... Editing tables in wiki syntax is no fun, but
> maintaining a private acl on this google doc sounds like hell to me.
>

just ask via the google doc...
lets see how it works, its for sure much easier to work with a real 
spreadsheet...