[Users] ovirt-3.3.3 release postponed due to blockers
Sandro Bonazzola
sbonazzo at redhat.com
Fri Jan 31 08:36:48 UTC 2014
Il 30/01/2014 22:38, Robert Story ha scritto:
> Can we revert these packages to previous versions in the 3.3.2 stable repo
> so those of us who want/need to install new hosts in our clusters aren't
> dead in the water waiting for 3.3.3?
Hi Robert, I think you can still install 3.3.2 on your clusters with the requirement of adding
manually oython-cpopen before trying to install vdsm.
About 3.3.3, I think vdsm should really drop dependency on vdsm-python-cpopen:
it's a package obsoleted by python-cpopen so there's no point in still requiring it especially if keeping that requirement still break dependency
resolution.
>
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 16:26:51 +0100 Sandro wrote:
> SB> Il 30/01/2014 16:13, Yaniv Bronheim ha scritto:
> SB> > Hey,
> SB> >
> SB> > we found this yum bug and still struggling with more issuing
> SB> > according to the relation between those packages
> SB> >
> SB> > if we drop vdsm-python-cpopen the requirement in vdsm takes
> SB> > python-cpopen instead. in python-cpopen we have the same code base
> SB> > and it provides all vdsm-ptyhon-cpopen provides, so shouldn't be any
> SB> > issues with dropping it from the repository
> SB> >
> SB> > is it possible to ship 3.3.3 release that way ? we don't need to
> SB> > change the requirement in the code, if python-cpopen 1.3-1 is part of
> SB> > the release, it will be taken by vdsm spec (tried with vdsm 4.13.3-2
> SB> > with the available cpopen 1.3-1)
> SB> >
> SB>
> SB> I can't release 3.3.3 that way.
> SB> We're keeping rolling releases on stable repository so if I don't
> SB> provide 4.13.3-2, previous one will still be available.
>
>
> Robert
>
> --
> Senior Software Engineer @ Parsons
>
--
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
More information about the Arch
mailing list