[node-devel] Versioning of oVirt Node

[Fabian Deutsch]

Am Montag, den 31.03.2014, 05:16 -0400 schrieb Barak Azulay:
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Fabian Deutsch" <fabiand at redhat.com>
> > To: "Barak Azulay" <bazulay at redhat.com>
> > Cc: arch at ovirt.org, "Douglas Landgraf" <dlandgra at redhat.com>, "node-devel" <node-devel at ovirt.org>
> > Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 10:46:01 AM
> > Subject: Re: [node-devel] Versioning of oVirt Node
> > 
> > Am Sonntag, den 30.03.2014, 05:51 -0400 schrieb Barak Azulay:
> > > > Should we also consider parallel versions of different
> > > distributions(?)
> > > > (fc19, fc20).
> > > 
> > > Doesn't this miss the entire node purpose ? a user should not care
> > > what platform was used to build the node.
> > 
> > As said elsewhere. For some users the base-os is important to know.
> 
> Any idea why ?
> 
> The only thing I can think off is that we are probably doing something wrong.

Some  people just want to use CentOS, others favor Fedora.

I believe partially it's just a personal preference.

OTOH it is surely the case that el6 is slower moving then Fedora, and
thus it is more stable. I'd also say that this is true for the el6 based
Node.

We keep the Fedora based Node around - or bring it back - to have a
platform to develop on.

- fabian

> > 
> > - fabian
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Arch mailing list
> > Arch at ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
> > 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/arch/attachments/20140331/2a33e7a5/attachment.sig>