[ovirt-devel] Registration duplication?

[Fabian Deutsch]

On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Douglas Schilling Landgraf
<dougsland at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 07/22/2015 09:42 AM, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
>>
>> Hey,
>>
>> I've seen that some new code landed to support Engine registration
>> using the generic registration approach.
>>
>> But it seem that we now have two implementations:
>>
>> 1. vdsm-tool register [0]
>> 2. ovirt-register [1]
>>
>> To reduce code duplication I'd suggest to drop one of these approaches
>> before we enter 3.6.
>> Or are there reasons for keeping both of them?
>
> I believe not.

Great.

>> My take is to keep ovirt-register which is independent and would allow
>> us to add plain hosts to Engine (host-deploy is then taking care of
>> the rest IIUIC).
>> The vdsm-tool approach reuqires vdsm to be installed.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
>
> +1 for dropping vdsm-tool register verb. It started as alternative and later
> we merged everything in ovirt-register project which is the generic
> registration. I can send a patch to drop it soon.

Right.
So let's see what Dan replies and then we can possibly drop the
duplicate effort.

Thanks
fabian