[ovirt-devel] [ACTION REQUIRED] VDSM Broken dependencies on master

[Sandro Bonazzola]

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Petr Horacek <phoracek at redhat.com> wrote:

> Anything with openvswitch >= 2.0 is fine for me.
>

please note that vdsm-hook-ovs-4.17.2-151.git6b67464.el7.noarch is
requiring openvswitch >= 0:2 instead of openvswitch >= 2.0.
this cause a dependency resolution failure in centos where epoch is not
used.




>
>
> Petr
>
> 2015-09-18 7:31 GMT+02:00 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com>:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Petr Horacek <phoracek at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I tried
>>> https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/openstack-liberty/testing/el7/
>>> but it seems like there is no openvswitch in it.
>>>
>>> However, openstack-kilo is ok.
>>>
>>
>> Just another question, is it ok if I add a
>>
>> http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/cloud/$basearch/openstack-kilo/
>> instead?
>> it has openvswitch-2.3.1-2.el7.x86_64.rpm
>> <http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/openstack-kilo/common/openvswitch-2.3.1-2.el7.x86_64.rpm>
>> I'd rather prefer to work with CentOS Cloud SIG there.
>>
>> This will allow to rely on centos-release-openstack.noarch for CentOS
>> Virt SIG oVirt releases.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Petr
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2015-09-17 13:47 GMT+02:00 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com>:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Dan Kenigsberg <danken at redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 09:17:55AM +0200, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
>>>>> > *Hi:*
>>>>> >
>>>>> > *06:37:41* package: vdsm-hook-ovs-4.17.2-142.git932c120.el7.noarch
>>>>> > from check-custom-el7
>>>>> >
>>>>> > *06:37:41*   unresolved deps:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > *06:37:41*      openvswitch >= 0:2
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/repos_master_check-closure_merged/DISTRIBUTION=centos7/707/console
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Please provide the missing dependency or drop it ASAP.
>>>>>
>>>>> Petr, we've forgotten about this job, apparently.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sandro, can we exclude vdsm-hook-ovs from the closure job? It is still
>>>>> rather a step-offstpring of Vdsm which is less acute to test.
>>>>>
>>>>> However, can we instead add
>>>>>
>>>>> https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/openstack-juno/epel-7/
>>>>> to the repos available to this job?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Juno? Aren't we using Kilo? And being master, what about Liberty?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/46135/3/automation/check-patch.repos.el7
>>>>> attempts to do so to the per-patch rpm installation job.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dan.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sandro Bonazzola
>>>> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community
>>>> collaboration.
>>>> See how it works at redhat.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sandro Bonazzola
>> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
>> See how it works at redhat.com
>>
>
>


-- 
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20150918/ceb21018/attachment-0001.html>