[ovirt-devel] [ACTION REQUIRED] VDSM Broken dependencies on master

[Sandro Bonazzola]

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:32 PM, Petr Horacek <phoracek at redhat.com> wrote:

> Why is that? In vdsm.spec.in is 'Requires:       openvswitch >= 2'.
> Should i
> change it to 2.0?
>

2.0.0 better.


>
>
> Petr
>
> 2015-09-18 14:59 GMT+02:00 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com>:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Petr Horacek <phoracek at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Anything with openvswitch >= 2.0 is fine for me.
>>>
>>
>> please note that vdsm-hook-ovs-4.17.2-151.git6b67464.el7.noarch is
>> requiring openvswitch >= 0:2 instead of openvswitch >= 2.0.
>> this cause a dependency resolution failure in centos where epoch is not
>> used.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Petr
>>>
>>> 2015-09-18 7:31 GMT+02:00 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com>:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Petr Horacek <phoracek at redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> I tried
>>>>> https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/openstack-liberty/testing/el7/
>>>>> but it seems like there is no openvswitch in it.
>>>>>
>>>>> However, openstack-kilo is ok.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Just another question, is it ok if I add a
>>>>
>>>> http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/cloud/$basearch/openstack-kilo/
>>>> instead?
>>>> it has openvswitch-2.3.1-2.el7.x86_64.rpm
>>>> <http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/openstack-kilo/common/openvswitch-2.3.1-2.el7.x86_64.rpm>
>>>> I'd rather prefer to work with CentOS Cloud SIG there.
>>>>
>>>> This will allow to rely on centos-release-openstack.noarch for CentOS
>>>> Virt SIG oVirt releases.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Petr
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2015-09-17 13:47 GMT+02:00 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Dan Kenigsberg <danken at redhat.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 09:17:55AM +0200, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
>>>>>>> > *Hi:*
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > *06:37:41* package: vdsm-hook-ovs-4.17.2-142.git932c120.el7.noarch
>>>>>>> > from check-custom-el7
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > *06:37:41*   unresolved deps:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > *06:37:41*      openvswitch >= 0:2
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/repos_master_check-closure_merged/DISTRIBUTION=centos7/707/console
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Please provide the missing dependency or drop it ASAP.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Petr, we've forgotten about this job, apparently.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sandro, can we exclude vdsm-hook-ovs from the closure job? It is
>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>> rather a step-offstpring of Vdsm which is less acute to test.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> However, can we instead add
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/openstack-juno/epel-7/
>>>>>>> to the repos available to this job?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Juno? Aren't we using Kilo? And being master, what about Liberty?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/46135/3/automation/check-patch.repos.el7
>>>>>>> attempts to do so to the per-patch rpm installation job.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dan.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Sandro Bonazzola
>>>>>> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community
>>>>>> collaboration.
>>>>>> See how it works at redhat.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sandro Bonazzola
>>>> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community
>>>> collaboration.
>>>> See how it works at redhat.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sandro Bonazzola
>> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
>> See how it works at redhat.com
>>
>
>


-- 
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20150923/173e3489/attachment-0001.html>