[ovirt-devel] sync meeting - Vdsm 2.2

Martin Polednik mpolednik at redhat.com
Thu Feb 4 10:40:38 UTC 2016


On 04/02/16 12:13 +0200, Nir Soffer wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Martin Polednik <mpolednik at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Dan Kenigsberg" <danken at redhat.com>
>>> To: "devel" <devel at ovirt.org>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2016 5:19:12 PM
>>> Subject: [ovirt-devel] sync meeting - Vdsm 2.2
>>>
>>> (nir, piotr, danken)
>>>
>>> - splitting supervdsmServer:
>>>   I think that its a good idea, and that https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/52875/
>>>   is a good start.
>>>   It would give a nice separation of responsibility, and may serve as a
>>>   "teaser" for how Vdsm's public API can be broken apart.
>>>
>>>   Nir is worried that it would introduce instability for no immediate gain,
>>>   while distracting us from solving the supervdsmServer memory leak, or
>>>   possible security concens
>>>
>>> - schema conversion: Piotr presented his https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/52864/
>>>   which would convert the json-based schema into a cleaner yaml-based one,
>>>   which would be easier to version, validate, and obsolete.
>>>
>>> - Nir was unhappy with recent changes to the contrib client:
>>>   https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/q/status:open+project:vdsm+branch:master+topic:jsonrpc-client
>>>   would prefer using standard stomp client
>>>
>>> - name discussion is stalling. some people are worried that a rename may
>>>   turn out to be expensive (release engineering, outher packages,
>>>   interal module and function name). Still, it would be fun to foresake
>>>   the non-pronounceable name "vdsm". ovirt-hostd seems like a front
>>>   runner at the moment.
>>>
>>> - Nir has advocated trying to use https://trello.com/b/U3lsbVRU/maintenance
>>> to
>>>   maintain the list of our pending tasks. Let's try.
>>
>> Awesome idea! I propose that we add the board to community section of
>> our wiki[1] since the board is public and great first stop for potential
>> contributors (or project newcomers).
>
>It is a wiki, you can do it.

No permissions for the community page. That's why it was a proposal.

>But note that the wiki is going to be replaced by
>https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-site
>
>I'm not sure if the new side is taking automatically new changes
>from the wiki, so you may want to send also a pull request to the
>new site.

Good point!

>Nir
>
>>
>> [1] http://www.ovirt.org/Community
>>
>>> Ciao!
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Devel mailing list
>>> Devel at ovirt.org
>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Devel mailing list
>> Devel at ovirt.org
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>_______________________________________________
>Devel mailing list
>Devel at ovirt.org
>http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



More information about the Devel mailing list