[ovirt-devel] [Call for Vote] moVirt as a Full oVirt Project

Eldad Marciano emarcian at redhat.com
Tue Nov 29 12:48:43 UTC 2016


+1

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com>
wrote:

> Brian, Board, I think we have enough +1.
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Jakub Niedermertl <jniederm at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Roman Mohr" <rmohr at redhat.com>
>> > To: "Brian Proffitt" <bproffit at redhat.com>
>> > Cc: "Michal Skrivanek" <mskrivan at redhat.com>, board at ovirt.org, "devel"
>> <devel at ovirt.org>
>> > Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 9:30:23 AM
>> > Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] [Call for Vote] moVirt as a Full oVirt
>> Project
>> >
>> > +1
>> >
>> > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Brian Proffitt < bproffit at redhat.com >
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > All:
>> >
>> > The moVirt Project was initially accepted as an oVirt incubator project
>> in
>> > February 2015. It has been a successful subproject for quite some time
>> and
>> > it is well due for being accepted as a full oVirt project. I believe it
>> is
>> > appropriate to post a Call for Vote on the Devel and Board lists.
>> >
>> > http://www.ovirt.org/develop/projects/project-movirt/
>> >
>> > A “healthy” project, as determined by the oVirt Board, can be found at
>> > http://www.ovirt.org/develop/projects/adding-a-new-project/
>> >
>> > Voting will be open until 1200 UTC Nov. 30, 2016. A net total of +7
>> votes
>> > should be received to formalize this project as an full oVirt project.
>> > Please use the following vote process:
>> >
>> > +1
>> > Yes, agree, or the action should be performed. On some issues, this
>> vote must
>> > only be given after the voter has tested the action on their own
>> system(s).
>> >
>> > ±0
>> > Abstain, no opinion, or I am happy to let the other group members
>> decide this
>> > issue. An abstention may have detrimental affects if too many people
>> > abstain.
>> >
>> > -1
>> > No, I veto this action. All vetos must include an explanation of why
>> the veto
>> > is appropriate. A veto with no explanation is void.
>> >
>> > Thank you!
>> >
>> > Brian Proffitt
>> > Principal Community Analyst
>> > Open Source and Standards
>> > @TheTechScribe
>> > 574.383.9BKP
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Devel mailing list
>> > Devel at ovirt.org
>> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Devel mailing list
>> > Devel at ovirt.org
>> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>> _______________________________________________
>> Devel mailing list
>> Devel at ovirt.org
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Sandro Bonazzola
> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
> See how it works at redhat.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>



-- 
-Eldad
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20161129/e95e3dd9/attachment.html>


More information about the Devel mailing list