[ovirt-devel] [ OST Failure Report ] [ oVirt master ] [ 01/08/2017 ] [add_secondary_storage_domains]

Marc Young 3vilpenguin at gmail.com
Mon Aug 14 12:31:29 UTC 2017 

Thanks for clarifying, that makes sense in hindsight since its testing
things in their entirety. This is more of a rabbit hole for me as Im really
just trying to learn Lago by using the OST project (since I'll be
duplicating a lot of the setup).

stdout logs from a run: https://pastebin.com/KBDaCCYp

On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 6:44 AM, Eyal Edri <eedri at redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Marc Young <3vilpenguin at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Ill try to get some detailed log files later, but fwiw I'm not running
>> the hc suites (afaik, Im still getting inundated with the system
>> tests/lago). The link I used for Jenkins was just to try to pull the latest
>> 'passing' hash for ovirt-system-tests
>>
>
> I see, its a bit more complicated than that I'm afraid, the HASH you see
> is probably on for OST code itself, while the suites can fail on any oVirt
> project ( ovirt-engine/vdsm/host-deploy/etc.... ), so its more than just
> a single hash, but rather a list of RPMs and their versions, together with
> hash of OST ( for the tests themselves ) and also OS updates.
>
>
>>
>> The errors have all been from master branch on the basic suite for 4.1
>> via:
>>
>> $ ./run_suite.sh basic-suite-4.1/
>>
>>
> OK, then we need to investigate it and understand why add host fails on
> 4.1, please provide logs when possible.
>
> BTW, you can also try running the manual job [1], but you'll need to
> provide it with custom yum repo URL with your built artifacts to test your
> code.
> There is a section on it on the OST readthedocs page.
>
> [1] http://jenkins.ovirt.org/view/oVirt%20system%20tests/
> job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/
>
>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 12:29 AM, Eyal Edri <eedri at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I see you run the 'hc' suite, which means hyperconverged. This suite is
>>> running an hosted engine on gluster storage, It's a more complex suite than
>>> the basic one, and prone to more errors, however it should still work, but
>>> if you don't require it specifically, I would recommend running the basic
>>> suite, which should be easier to debug and also quicker to run.
>>>
>>> I'm also adding hc maintainer so she can check, can you share the link
>>> to the Jenkins job you're running? Or the log files if you're running
>>> locally.
>>>
>>> On Aug 14, 2017 06:00, "Marc Young" <3vilpenguin at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Actually I spoke too soon, still fails:
>>>>
>>>> + lago ovirt runtest /home/myoung/repos/github/ovir
>>>> t-system-tests/vagrant/test-scenarios/002_bootstrap.py
>>>> @ Run test: 002_bootstrap.py:
>>>> nose.config: INFO: Ignoring files matching ['^\\.', '^_',
>>>> '^setup\\.py$']
>>>>   # print_api_ver:
>>>>   # print_api_ver: Success (in 0:00:00)
>>>>   # add_dc:
>>>>   # add_dc: Success (in 0:00:43)
>>>>   # add_cluster:
>>>>   # add_cluster: Success (in 0:00:03)
>>>>   # add_hosts:
>>>> dd
>>>>     * Collect artifacts:
>>>>     * Collect artifacts: Success (in 0:01:14)
>>>>   # add_hosts: Success (in 0:16:36)
>>>>   # Results located at /home/myoung/repos/github/ovir
>>>> t-system-tests/deployment-vagrant/default/002_bootstrap.py.junit.xml
>>>> @ Run test: 002_bootstrap.py: Success (in 0:17:26)
>>>> Error occured, aborting
>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtlago/cmd.py", line 360,
>>>> in do_run
>>>>     self.cli_plugins[args.ovirtverb].do_run(args)
>>>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/lago/plugins/cli.py", line
>>>> 184, in do_run
>>>>     self._do_run(**vars(args))
>>>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/lago/utils.py", line 501, in
>>>> wrapper
>>>>     return func(*args, **kwargs)
>>>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/lago/utils.py", line 512, in
>>>> wrapper
>>>>     return func(*args, prefix=prefix, **kwargs)
>>>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtlago/cmd.py", line 99,
>>>> in do_ovirt_runtest
>>>>     raise RuntimeError('Some tests failed')
>>>> RuntimeError: Some tests failed
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 9:47 PM, Marc Young <3vilpenguin at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Edit: reply-all
>>>>>
>>>>> It does, every time.
>>>>> I got it to pass by using the last passing revision from Jenkins (hash
>>>>> 98ae6d0b452d098f2703a197deb082a091bba837 ), noted from
>>>>> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/system-tests_hc-basic-suite-mas
>>>>> ter/15/consoleFull
>>>>>
>>>>> Not sure if it's a true race condition, that build in Jenkins has
>>>>> failed consistently since #15
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 2:03 AM, Eyal Edri <eedri at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 9:34 PM, Marc Young <3vilpenguin at gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What's the fix for this for those of us using ovirt-system-tests?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Im trying to adapt some of the code for testing a third party tool,
>>>>>>> but master is still failing on 002_bootstrap
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It fails consistently?
>>>>>> AFAIK this is a race condition that happens maybe once a week, can
>>>>>> you share your logs? is it also failing on add_secondary_storage?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Benny Zlotnik <bzlotnik at redhat.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm not sure it's related since the LSM test runs much later, in 004
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Eyal Edri <eedri at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Adding Allon & Benny.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Is it possible to verify this is related to the LSM issue we've
>>>>>>>>> been handling in [1]?
>>>>>>>>> If this is the case, we agreed to disable the test next time it
>>>>>>>>> fails, as the current workarounds with sleep isn't enough.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Can you confirm this is the case, and so we'll have to disable
>>>>>>>>> this test until one of the RFEs described in [1] is merged?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [1] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/78613/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 2:45 PM, Barak Korren <bkorren at redhat.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 1 August 2017 at 14:39, Nir Soffer <nsoffer at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 2:34 PM Barak Korren <bkorren at redhat.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>> >> Test failed: [ 002_bootstrap.add_secondary_storage_domains ]
>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>> >> Link to suspected patches:
>>>>>>>>>> >> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/79974
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > This patch adds missing log when resizing an online disk - why
>>>>>>>>>> do you think
>>>>>>>>>> > it is related to the failure?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Because it is the only patch participating in the test.
>>>>>>>>>> (The test was equivalent to running the manual job with just this
>>>>>>>>>> patch)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Then again this may also one of the usual SD testing race
>>>>>>>>>> conditions.
>>>>>>>>>> Since the code in the patch seemed to be related to storage I
>>>>>>>>>> didn't
>>>>>>>>>> want to just assume that.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Barak Korren
>>>>>>>>>> RHV DevOps team , RHCE, RHCi
>>>>>>>>>> Red Hat EMEA
>>>>>>>>>> redhat.com | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. | redhat.com/trusted
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> Devel mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> Devel at ovirt.org
>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Eyal edri
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ASSOCIATE MANAGER
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> RHV DevOps
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> EMEA VIRTUALIZATION R&D
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>
>>>>>>>>> <https://red.ht/sig> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.
>>>>>>>>> <https://redhat.com/trusted>
>>>>>>>>> phone: +972-9-7692018 <+972%209-769-2018>
>>>>>>>>> irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Devel mailing list
>>>>>>>> Devel at ovirt.org
>>>>>>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Eyal edri
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ASSOCIATE MANAGER
>>>>>>
>>>>>> RHV DevOps
>>>>>>
>>>>>> EMEA VIRTUALIZATION R&D
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>
>>>>>> <https://red.ht/sig> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.
>>>>>> <https://redhat.com/trusted>
>>>>>> phone: +972-9-7692018 <+972%209-769-2018>
>>>>>> irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ)
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Eyal edri
>
>
> ASSOCIATE MANAGER
>
> RHV DevOps
>
> EMEA VIRTUALIZATION R&D
>
>
> Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>
> <https://red.ht/sig> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted>
> phone: +972-9-7692018 <+972%209-769-2018>
> irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ)
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20170814/28132b75/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Devel mailing list