[ovirt-devel] oVirt 4.2.0 RC3 status

[Dan Kenigsberg]

On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com>
wrote:

>
>
> 2017-12-18 8:37 GMT+01:00 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com>:
>
>>
>>
>> 2017-12-18 8:29 GMT+01:00 Dan Kenigsberg <danken at redhat.com>:
>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>> according to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=flag%
>>>> 3Ablocker%2B%20target_milestone%3Aovirt-4.2.0%20status%3Anew
>>>> %2Cassigned%2Cpost%2Cmodified
>>>> we just need to rebuild VDSM to complete the acknowledged blockers.
>>>>
>>>> We still have a proposed blocker in NEW state according to
>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=flag%
>>>> 3Ablocker%3F%20target_milestone%3Aovirt-4.2.0%20status%3Anew
>>>> %2Cassigned%2Cpost%2Cmodified
>>>>
>>>> 1525907 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525907> Storage
>>>> vdsm General danken at redhat.com NEW VDSM is in recovery mode after a
>>>> restart in fresh install...
>>>> <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525907> urgent urgent
>>>> ovirt-4.2.0 Sat 18:12
>>>>
>>>> Dan, please review, let us know if we have to block on this or if we
>>>> can postpone to 4.2.1.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I don't think it is for me to review.
>>>
>>> The bug is very confusing and sparse in information, but it seems to
>>> claim that self-hosted engine is not deployable. I think that it is for
>>> Simone to reply to that claim. Is it true? When? Do you think, like Adam,
>>> that this is a problem of host connectivity to its storage?
>>>
>>
>> Adam, Nir, Tal, Allon, can you please review?
>>
>
> Any update?
>

+Meital.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20171218/06132582/attachment.html>