[ovirt-devel] [ OST Failure Report ] [ oVirt master ] [ 22/02/2017 ] [add_secondary_storage_domains]

Barak Korren bkorren at redhat.com
Thu Feb 23 16:02:28 UTC 2017


Great!

This OST experimental run is verifying that:
http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/test-repo_ovirt_experimental_master/5503/

Hope it doesn't fail on something else...

On 23 February 2017 at 17:38, Nir Soffer <nsoffer at redhat.com> wrote:
> Fixed in
>
> commit 726e946257174926ea2591a1c4a3be2dae4297ea
> Author: Nir Soffer <nsoffer at redhat.com>
> Date:   Thu Feb 23 16:45:45 2017 +0200
>
>     sp: Mark helper method as @unsecured
>
>     In commit 7cf19dafd7cd (storage_mailbox: make inbox/outbox mailbox
>     args), we added a helper that is used before the spm is started, but the
>     helper was not marked as @unsecure. This cause the call to fail with:
>
>         File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/sp.py", line 485, in
> __createMailboxMonitor
>             outbox = self._master_volume_path("inbox")
>           File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/securable.py",
>         line 77, in wrapper
>             raise SecureError("Secured object is not in safe state")
>         SecureError: Secured object is not in safe state
>
>     As this helper doesn't change the state of the storage pool, there is no
>     reason to treat it as a secured method, which is the default for this
>     class.
>
>     Change-Id: Icf92b9474c9000840a5c15e3b91f2ced4d02aca2
>     Signed-off-by: Nir Soffer <nsoffer at redhat.com>
>
> Verified with http://jenkins.ovirt.org/view/oVirt%20system%20tests/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/64/console
>
> Thanks for reporting this.
>
> Nir
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Nir Soffer <nsoffer at redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 4:51 PM, Yaniv Kaul <ykaul at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 4:43 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Barak Korren <bkorren at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> > On 23 February 2017 at 16:35, Nir Soffer <nsoffer at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> >> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 9:37 AM, Barak Korren <bkorren at redhat.com>
>>>> >> wrote:
>>>> >>> Test failed: [ add_secondary_storage_domains ]
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Note:
>>>> >>> - This may or may not be related to
>>>> >>>   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421945
>>>> >>>   The BZ talks about sporadic failures, while this seems to be
>>>> >>>   happening consistently (for 6 runs so far)
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Link to suspected patches:
>>>> >>> - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/70415
>>>> >>> - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/69157
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Why do you suspect these patches?
>>>> >
>>>> > Because the test right before them passed.
>>>> > These are all the changes that caused the failing OST job to run.
>>>> >
>>>> >> Did you try to run the tests with the latest patches before these
>>>> >> patches?
>>>> >
>>>> > Yes, the test before them pass.
>>>>
>>>> Your are correct, these patches are broken:
>>>>
>>>> 2017-02-22 16:13:00,745-0500 ERROR (jsonrpc/1)
>>>> [storage.TaskManager.Task]
>>>> (Task='4f670db2-70c2-4c21-96ff-114f57de70c0') Unexpected error
>>>> (task:871)
>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/task.py", line
>>>> 878, in _run
>>>>     return fn(*args, **kargs)
>>>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/logUtils.py", line 52, in
>>>> wrapper
>>>>     res = f(*args, **kwargs)
>>>>   File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/hsm.py", line 989, in connectStoragePool
>>>>     spUUID, hostID, msdUUID, masterVersion, domainsMap)
>>>>   File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/hsm.py", line 1051, in _connectStoragePool
>>>>     res = pool.connect(hostID, msdUUID, masterVersion)
>>>>   File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/sp.py", line 672, in connect
>>>>     self.__createMailboxMonitor()
>>>>   File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/sp.py", line 485, in
>>>> __createMailboxMonitor
>>>>     outbox = self._master_volume_path("inbox")
>>>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/securable.py",
>>>> line 77, in wrapper
>>>>     raise SecureError("Secured object is not in safe state")
>>>> SecureError: Secured object is not in safe state
>>>
>>>
>>> It's very confusing that this error is sometimes harmless and sometimes
>>> isn't - how did you identify it as problematic?
>>
>> It depends on the context.
>>
>> Here we called __createMailboxMontior, which is something we call
>> when creating an instance, and is marked as @unsecured.
>>
>> This call is calling now a new helper introduced in 7cf19dafd7cd,
>> but the helper was not marked as @unsecured. This will raise
>> UnsecureError, which will fail the current flow.
>>
>> We have another instance of this during upgrade domain flow - I think
>> we have the same issue there, but this needs investigation.
>>
>> Other errors means that a real secured method is called when a host
>> is not hte spm. This may be bad client code, or unavoidable, since
>> there is no race-free way to check that a host is the spm before
>> calling a method on the spm.
>>
>>> Y.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm sending a fix.
>>>>
>>>> Nir
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > Barak Korren
>>>> > bkorren at redhat.com
>>>> > RHCE, RHCi, RHV-DevOps Team
>>>> > https://ifireball.wordpress.com/
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Devel mailing list
>>>> Devel at ovirt.org
>>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



-- 
Barak Korren
bkorren at redhat.com
RHCE, RHCi, RHV-DevOps Team
https://ifireball.wordpress.com/


More information about the Devel mailing list