[ovirt-devel] VDSM master fc24 build artifacts fails

[Greg Sheremeta]

I can't start latest master engine (just fetched) with the same error

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/greg/ovirt-engine/share/ovirt-engine/services/ovirt-engine/ovirt-engine.py",
line 32, in <module>
    from ovirt_engine import service
  File "/home/greg/ovirt-engine/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirt_engine/service.py",
line 35, in <module>
    from dateutil import tz
ImportError: No module named dateutil


On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:23 AM, Dan Kenigsberg <danken at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Martin Perina <mperina at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Gil Shinar <gshinar at redhat.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Eyal, I have tried to reach you last evening with no success so I told
> >>> Sandro that it is his call.
> >>> I've talked with Danken this morning and he said that this permutation
> >>> should be excluded so I have abandon my patch.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks all
> >>> Gil
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:02 AM, Eyal Edri <eedri at redhat.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Irit Goihman <igoihman at redhat.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I see fc24 was excluded from master jobs:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/69233/10/jobs/confs/projects/
> vdsm/vdsm_standard.yaml
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I think at the time of the patch there was agreement we build only
> >>>> latest fedora, so 25 instead of 24.
> >>>>
> >>>> Anyway, its up to the maintainer, but I vote to build fc25 since fc24
> >>>> will also be EOL in a few months time.
> >>
> >>
> >> As I said in different thread VDSM can be built for FC25, but it cannot
> be
> >> used [1]. So FC24 is the latest usable version ...
> >>
> >> [1]
> >>
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414075
> >
> >
> >
> > Dan, Eyal, please reach a fedora version usable status.
> > Either we move to fc25 (or later) or we stay to fc24, but we need CI to
> be
> > able to build and run it.
> > We can't leave CI broken.
>
> Which CI job is broken with f25?
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>



-- 
Greg Sheremeta, MBA
Red Hat, Inc.
Sr. Software Engineer
gshereme at redhat.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20170126/b009ba73/attachment-0001.html>