[ovirt-devel] VDSM master fc24 build artifacts fails

[Martin Perina]

Greg,

I'm sorry about that, I forgot to send official announcement about that.

I will do that asap.

Martin


On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Greg Sheremeta <gshereme at redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Greg Sheremeta <gshereme at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I can't start latest master engine (just fetched) with the same error
>>
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>   File "/home/greg/ovirt-engine/share/ovirt-engine/services/ovirt-engine/ovirt-engine.py",
>> line 32, in <module>
>>     from ovirt_engine import service
>>   File "/home/greg/ovirt-engine/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirt_engine/service.py",
>> line 35, in <module>
>>     from dateutil import tz
>> ImportError: No module named dateutil
>>
>
> Fixed with a simple 'sudo dnf install python-dateutil'
>
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:23 AM, Dan Kenigsberg <danken at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Martin Perina <mperina at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Gil Shinar <gshinar at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Eyal, I have tried to reach you last evening with no success so I
>>> told
>>> >>> Sandro that it is his call.
>>> >>> I've talked with Danken this morning and he said that this
>>> permutation
>>> >>> should be excluded so I have abandon my patch.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Thanks all
>>> >>> Gil
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:02 AM, Eyal Edri <eedri at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Irit Goihman <igoihman at redhat.com>
>>> >>>> wrote:
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> I see fc24 was excluded from master jobs:
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/69233/10/jobs/confs/projects/vd
>>> sm/vdsm_standard.yaml
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> I think at the time of the patch there was agreement we build only
>>> >>>> latest fedora, so 25 instead of 24.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Anyway, its up to the maintainer, but I vote to build fc25 since
>>> fc24
>>> >>>> will also be EOL in a few months time.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> As I said in different thread VDSM can be built for FC25, but it
>>> cannot be
>>> >> used [1]. So FC24 is the latest usable version ...
>>> >>
>>> >> [1]
>>> >>
>>> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414075
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Dan, Eyal, please reach a fedora version usable status.
>>> > Either we move to fc25 (or later) or we stay to fc24, but we need CI
>>> to be
>>> > able to build and run it.
>>> > We can't leave CI broken.
>>>
>>> Which CI job is broken with f25?
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Devel mailing list
>>> Devel at ovirt.org
>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Greg Sheremeta, MBA
>> Red Hat, Inc.
>> Sr. Software Engineer
>> gshereme at redhat.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Greg Sheremeta, MBA
> Red Hat, Inc.
> Sr. Software Engineer
> gshereme at redhat.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20170126/797dfb0f/attachment.html>