[ovirt-devel] [ OST Failure Report ] [ oVirt master ] [ 14/05/2017 ] [ test-repo_ovirt_experimental_master ]

Mon May 15 09:40:50 UTC 2017

I agree with Nir that the above issue is not related to the job failure.

I see that there is a timeout for:

2017-05-14 04:10:04,215-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.vdsm.jsonrpc.client.reactors.stomp.StompCommonClient]
(org.ovirt.thread.pool-7-thread-12) [] Message sent: SEND
destination:jms.topic.vdsm_requests
content-length:377
reply-to:jms.topic.vdsm_responses

<JsonRpcRequest id: "846f4741-5c7d-4396-8ed7-ce995d426728", method:
Host.setupNetworks, params: {networks={Migration_Net={vlan=200,
ipv6autoconf=false, nic=eth0, bridged=false, dhcpv6=false, mtu=1500,
ipv6addr=2001:0db8:85a3:0000:0000:574c:14ea:0a02/64, switch=legacy}},
bondings={}, options={connectivityTimeout=120,
connectivityCheck=true}}>

and the timeout occurred at:

2017-05-14 04:10:07,535-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.vdsm.jsonrpc.client.internal.ResponseWorker]
(ResponseWorker) [] Message received:
{"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":"lago-basic-suite-master-host1:286640862","message":"Vds
timeout occured"},"id":null}

I see in supervdsm log:

MainProcess|jsonrpc/1::INFO::2017-05-14
04:10:05,566::netconfpersistence::52::root::(setNetwork) Adding
network Migration_Net({u'ipv6autoconf': False, 'nameservers': [],
u'nic': u'eth0', u'vlan': 200, u'mtu': 1500, u'switch': u'legacy',
u'dhcpv6': False, u'bridged': False, u'ipv6addr':
u'2001:0db8:85a3:0000:0000:574c:14ea:0a02/64', 'defaultRoute': False,
'bootproto': 'none'})
...
MainProcess|jsonrpc/1::WARNING::2017-05-14
04:10:05,580::ifcfg::247::root::(_addSourceRoute) Invalid input for
source routing: name=eth0.200, addr=None, netmask=None, gateway=None
netlink/events::DEBUG::2017-05-14
04:10:05,581::concurrent::184::root::(run) START thread
<Thread(netlink/events, started daemon 139829765465856)> (func=<bound
method Monitor._scan of <vdsm.network.netlink.monitor.Monitor object
at 0x7f2c8c01ebd0>>, args=(), kwargs={})
MainProcess|jsonrpc/1::WARNING::2017-05-14
04:10:05,581::ifcfg::894::root::(_ignore_missing_device) eth0.200
didn't exist (yet) and so IPv6 wasn't enabled.

My question is why only 3 seconds to timeout setupNetworks.

I found one more exception not related to the above issue which we should fix:

2017-05-14 04:08:08,924-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.timer.SchedulerUtilQuartzImpl]
(DefaultQuartzScheduler10) [58fd90c1] Exception:
java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor178.invoke(Unknown Source) [:1.8.0_131]
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
[rt.jar:1.8.0_131]
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498) [rt.jar:1.8.0_131]
at org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.timer.JobWrapper.invokeMethod(JobWrapper.java:83)
[scheduler.jar:]
at org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.timer.JobWrapper.execute(JobWrapper.java:55)
[scheduler.jar:]
at org.quartz.core.JobRunShell.run(JobRunShell.java:213) [quartz.jar:]
at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
[rt.jar:1.8.0_131]
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266) [rt.jar:1.8.0_131]
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
[rt.jar:1.8.0_131]
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
[rt.jar:1.8.0_131]
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) [rt.jar:1.8.0_131]
Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.monitoring.VmStatsRefresher.lambda$processDevices$0(VmStatsRefresher.java:44)
[vdsbroker.jar:]
at java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$2$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:174)
[rt.jar:1.8.0_131]
at java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$3$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:193)
[rt.jar:1.8.0_131]
at java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$2$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:175)
[rt.jar:1.8.0_131]
at java.util.ArrayList$ArrayListSpliterator.forEachRemaining(ArrayList.java:1374)
[rt.jar:1.8.0_131]
at java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.copyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:481)
[rt.jar:1.8.0_131]
at java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.wrapAndCopyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:471)
[rt.jar:1.8.0_131]
at java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp.evaluateSequential(ForEachOps.java:151)
[rt.jar:1.8.0_131]
at java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp$OfRef.evaluateSequential(ForEachOps.java:174)
[rt.jar:1.8.0_131]
at java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.evaluate(AbstractPipeline.java:234)
[rt.jar:1.8.0_131]
at java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline.forEach(ReferencePipeline.java:418)
[rt.jar:1.8.0_131]
at org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.monitoring.VmStatsRefresher.processDevices(VmStatsRefresher.java:46)
[vdsbroker.jar:]
at org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.monitoring.PollVmStatsRefresher.poll(PollVmStatsRefresher.java:44)
[vdsbroker.jar:]
... 11 more

Thanks,
Piotr

On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Nir Soffer <nsoffer at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 5:14 PM Shlomo Ben David <sbendavi at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Link to suspected patches: N/A
>> Link to Job:
>> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/test-repo_ovirt_experimental_master/6665/
>> Link to all logs:
>> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/test-repo_ovirt_experimental_master/6665/artifact/exported-artifacts/basic-suit-master-el7/test_logs/basic-suite-master/post-006_migrations.py/
>>
>> Error snippet from the log:
>
>
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>
>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/task.py", line 878,
>> in _run
>>     return fn(*args, **kargs)
>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/logUtils.py", line 52, in
>> wrapper
>>     res = f(*args, **kwargs)
>>   File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/hsm.py", line 2132, in getAllTasksStatuses
>>     allTasksStatus = self._pool.getAllTasksStatuses()
>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/securable.py", line
>> 77, in wrapper
>>     raise SecureError("Secured object is not in safe state")
>> SecureError: Secured object is not in safe state
>
>
> This means that getAllTasksStatuses (SPM verb) was called on a host
> which is not the SPM. This is an error in the caller, not in vdsm.
>
> We already have a bug abut this:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1426429
>
> However this build logs do not contain enough info. These
> patches adds more info that can help to identify the caller:
> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/76771
>
> This error is not related to the real error in this build.
>
> Nir
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel