[ovirt-devel] Adding new features to ovirt.org

[Oved Ourfali]

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Barak Korren <bkorren at redhat.com> wrote:

> On 16 November 2017 at 10:30, Martin Sivak <msivak at redhat.com> wrote:
> >> I wonder where did this category division come from, some of these,
> >> like "VDSM" or "Infra" or "SLA" may not be easy for users to
> >> understand.
> >> We need to be careful about using internal development terms in user
> >> facing documentation.
> >
> > And yet we require the user to select a team using the same terms when
> > filing a new bug..
> >
> > I agree with you, but I think the mandatory field in bugzilla is
> > another candidate for consideration.
>
> I've no disagreement with this statement, then again, I don't know
> much about the complex reasons behind the selection of fields used in
> bugzilla.
>
>
>
Nothing complex, to be honest.
The bugzilla "oVirt team" fields come to reflect the different teams owning
a bug.
Those are valuable for the teams, but some also make sense for users
(virt/storage/infra/network/dwh/node), while others might be a bit more
confusing (ux/integration/SLA).
Not sure what VDSM is with regards to the feature pages? maybe for old
features? I assume we can merge it into one of the others.
And we can send some explanation upstream (or better add one to the
website) if that helps.


>
> --
> Barak Korren
> RHV DevOps team , RHCE, RHCi
> Red Hat EMEA
> redhat.com | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. | redhat.com/trusted
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20171116/eb1239d4/attachment.html>