[ovirt-devel] oVirt CI now supports Fedora 27 and Fedora Rawhide

[Nir Soffer]

On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 4:55 PM Dan Kenigsberg <danken at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Nir Soffer <nsoffer at redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 3:59 PM Dan Kenigsberg <danken at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Nir Soffer <nsoffer at redhat.com> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 1:51 PM Edward Haas <ehaas at redhat.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Per what I see, all CI jobs on vdsm/fc27 fail.
> >> >> This is the second time this week, please consider reverting.
> >> >>
> >> >> We should try to avoid such changed before the weekend
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Some of the failures like
> >> >
> >> >
> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_master_check-patch-fc27-x86_64/100/console
> >> >
> >> > Should be fixed by:
> >> > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/84569/
> >> >
> >> > I have see some network test failing when running mock_runner locally,
> >> > you may need to mark them as broken on fc27.
> >>
> >> We have a busy couple of weeks until release of ovirt-4.2.0. As much
> >> as I like consuming Fedora early, I'm not sure that enabling so close
> >> to the release was a good idea. Nothing forces us to do it now (and
> >> there are a lot of reasons to do it later). Let's give it another go,
> >> but let us not keep it on the red for the weekend.
> >
> >
> > I'm happy with the storage code being tested on current fedora.
>
> I'm more than happy. I'm thrilled to for it to be tested and run.
> I am not happy to give a vote to a job that was never ever successful.
>

The job is successful, some tests or maybe the code they test need work.
This is why we have skipif/xfail and broken_on_ci.


>
> >
> > Please make sure the few failing network tests are not breaking the
> build.
>
> It's probably time to mark the tests that use loseup as broken-on-jenkins
>

loop devices are usually ok on jenkins. We have several tests in storage
using
them and I don't know about any failures. For example
storage/blockdev_test.py.

Francesco, do you want to mark them as broken for now?


>
> ERROR: Tests mkimage.injectFilesToFs creating an image and checking its
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File
> "/home/jenkins/workspace/vdsm_master_check-patch-el7-x86_64/vdsm/tests/testlib.py",
> line 143, in wrapper
>     return f(self, *args)
>   File
> "/home/jenkins/workspace/vdsm_master_check-patch-el7-x86_64/vdsm/tests/testValidation.py",
> line 191, in wrapper
>     return f(*args, **kwargs)
>   File
> "/home/jenkins/workspace/vdsm_master_check-patch-el7-x86_64/vdsm/tests/mkimage_test.py",
> line 176, in test_injectFilesToFs
>     mkimage.injectFilesToFs(floppy, self.files, fstype)
>   File
> "/home/jenkins/workspace/vdsm_master_check-patch-el7-x86_64/vdsm/lib/vdsm/mkimage.py",
> line 112, in injectFilesToFs
>     m.mount(mntOpts='loop', vfstype=fstype)
>   File
> "/home/jenkins/workspace/vdsm_master_check-patch-el7-x86_64/vdsm/lib/vdsm/storage/mount.py",
> line 208, in mount
>     cgroup=cgroup)
>   File
> "/home/jenkins/workspace/vdsm_master_check-patch-el7-x86_64/vdsm/lib/vdsm/storage/mount.py",
> line 278, in _mount
>     _runcmd(cmd)
>   File
> "/home/jenkins/workspace/vdsm_master_check-patch-el7-x86_64/vdsm/lib/vdsm/storage/mount.py",
> line 306, in _runcmd
>     raise MountError(rc, ";".join((out, err)))
> MountError: (32, ';mount:
>
> /tmp/vdsm-mkimage-testspahtvm/images/vmId_inject.7301b08f8c0dc496bedd25577dbddbd8.img:
> failed to setup loop device: No such file or directory\n')
>
>
>
> >
> > Nir
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20171123/4ca13c28/attachment.html>