[Engine-devel] Reloadable Configuration - Wiki Page

Sun Apr 1 09:44:07 UTC 2012

Indeed you're taking it sideways.
We have a concept we can improve, and this can be done in 2 ways;
1. Stop the press, break current implementation and re-write it to support instances.
2. Handle reload to help current users, and set (1) as an RFE for 3.2.

I'm not sure how long the engine can wait to stabilize after (1) or several iterations
of it. So gradually working toward it (such as 2 suggests) may be more user friendly.
Does it makes sense?

On 31/03/12 00:50, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
> I'm sorry if I'm moving the conversation sideways a bit but I was ill for a few days and missed out on all the fun :).
> The whole debate about permissions is a causing my spidy sense to tingle.
> 
> My main question is, What are the options you actually want to make as engine configuration?
> At least from my experience with VDSM 99% of the configuration options we have shouldn't be VDSM configuration but instance attributes.
> 
> To illustrate, the interval where you check liveness of hosts is not actually an Engine setting but a cluster or a host attribute. It should be set using the UI and the permissions to set it should be related to general permission on the object.
> The interval in which to check for storage liveness is a data center setting, not an Engine setting as well.
> 
> In general most options in a system are tied to object instances. The only things that I can think of that are actual Engine configurations are DB location, memory settings of the JVM and other technical details that should be accessible and set by the local root user only. This is also why I thought it shouldn't be in the DB, because if it's in the DB it's actually shared between installation and it's like sharing apache's "max thread num" setting between hosts with different capabilities.
> 
> Technical limitations like not being able to update quartz tasks once they've been initiated should be circumvented or abstracted but not designed around. 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Doron Fediuck" <dfediuck at redhat.com>
>> To: "Itamar Heim" <iheim at redhat.com>
>> Cc: engine-devel at ovirt.org
>> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 8:42:05 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Reloadable Configuration - Wiki Page
>>
>> On 29/03/12 12:13, Itamar Heim wrote:
>>> On 03/29/2012 11:59 AM, Doron Fediuck wrote:
>>>> On 29/03/12 10:54, Itamar Heim wrote:
>>>>> On 03/29/2012 10:05 AM, Muli Salem wrote:
>>>>>> Thanks for the comments, I updated the wiki page accordingly:
>>>>>> http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/ReloadableConfiguration
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. Instead of the new DB column is_reloadable -->   Annotation
>>>>>> to ConfigValues.
>>>>>> 2. Found a way to update the Quartz jobs, at least basic issues
>>>>>> such as interval size.
>>>>>> 3. The values will be reloaded upon admin's decision to do so -
>>>>>> with a new command in the engine-config CLI, since that is
>>>>>> where admins make the changes.
>>>>>
>>>>> just wondering - how will the CLI do this at the technical level
>>>>> (via REST API? signal to service, etc.)?
>>>>
>>>> Basically we need a script using the REST sdk to trigger
>>>> re-configuration
>>>> This script will need the engine's IP so it'll know where to find
>>>> it.
>>>> The thing is, REST also needs the admin's user and password to
>>>> run...
>>>>
>>>> We can get it in 2 options:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Store Admin's user+pass in the engine's conf file.
>>>> 2. Use engine-config to fetch the credentials.
>>>>
>>>> Once we have credentials, we can use it with a new script to
>>>> trigger configuration reload.
>>>> We can also incorporate this script into engine-config so admin
>>>> won't need to know another
>>>> script, and simply use a 'reload' verb.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not keen on storing the credentials in a conf' file, but
>>>> (unfortunately) it wouldn't
>>>> be a first time. Any better alternative is welcome (just as
>>>> patches ;-).
>>>
>>> true.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> A simple alternative to the whole credentials and IP need,
>>>> is a simple periodic reload, as suggested initially.
>>>
>>>
>> Any thoughts on this?
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> /d
>>>
>>> isn't there some way to send a process signal or something like
>>> that (not allowing remote access, but i think it uses the db
>>> crednetials from a local file anyway, and i don't think running
>>> config remotely is a must)
>>>
>> Simply signaling a process such as "kill TRAP PID" is problematic
>> since:
>> - The engine core is a web-app on top of JBoss, how do we know which
>> pid to trigger?
>> - What happens if JBoss isn't running / using nohup / ... ?
>>
>>> other options:
>>> 1. require user to provide user/password (kind of funny for running
>>> manage-domains utility, but possible
>> This will make service xxx reload pointless, unless we decide to drop
>> it and reduce to a simple
>> script (embedded or not in the config utility).
>>
>>> 2. use a way on the host to send a signal (change a file, process
>>> signal, etc.)
>> Great. This means we need to poll a folder or similar (DB)... sounds
>> familiar?
>> See above the periodic reload. We can do it better if we look for a
>> key in the DB
>> (enableReconfigure=true), to avoid reloading in the middle of an
>> update process
>> of several keys. We still need to be careful from concurrency, but I
>> have solutions
>> for this as well (do not allow updates to vdc_options until the key
>> becomes false again,
>> also set it to false on initial boot).
>>
>>>
>> 3. Write a simple public reload servlet (maybe limit to local host
>> only?), which
>> we can call using simple curl http://xxx/reload?
>>  
>> As I see it now,
>> I'd go for one of the following (in this order)-
>> 2: periodically poll DB, reload only when allowed.
>> 3: local servlet.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>> Better solutions?
>> _______________________________________________
>> Engine-devel mailing list
>> Engine-devel at ovirt.org
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
>>