[Engine-devel] Is there a preferred workflow when adding additional error messages to VDSM _and_ Engine?

[Lee Yarwood]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello all,

I'm currently working on a patch to correct the logic used by vdsm when
reviewing the logical and physical block size of physical volumes [1].
Once/If this is approved I'd like to look into making the exceptions
thrown from vdsm and the errors displayed within engine more descriptive.

Before I start throwing patches into gerrit I was wondering *if* there
is a preferred workflow when adding additional exceptions and error
messages across both projects. For example, committing changes to vdsm
before engine, engine before vdsm or both at the same time.

I'm also wondering if there is a way to say that vdsm gerrit changeid x
relies on engine gerrit changeid y etc?

Thanks in advance,

Lee
- -- 

Lee Yarwood
Software Maintenance Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd
200 Fowler Avenue IQ Farnborough, Farnborough, Hants GU14 7JP

Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903
Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Brendan Lane (Ireland), Matt
Parson(USA), Charlie Peters (USA)

GPG fingerprint : A5D1 9385 88CB 7E5F BE64  6618 BCA6 6E33 F672 2D76
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPgFjGAAoJELymbjP2ci12MScIANRBXgWPSjeSZvSM2+bZmDrD
FefJfxMcCQFtTqWYePXIxFgqeeRcFc57+6alExBRU2g9nKZJEIPn2vj640XSTGlt
n5T4ItED1IVydzuEXFOAvgaTmZfKzTQkxQWp8QgL6pC7cYgnp2nL7gkbkedx1JyI
gCgCGomrHeWP2++vUS8UjtCccZdTJiOiWqoH2sBCKgEVcmFMgvYREK6hTou4DHU4
DcpureWuLvM4HWUlyfl37eXQOmy66A7uHGp3xF5sykQZ9aozaiMFjSoCqQOEVqO6
jHRnsQB6FfF/xU+F/UQK5PKZOm7e+KvrMjhIDfR+/DX3t0rkrtc69gg2O6duy4o=
=vdud
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----