[Engine-devel] [Spice-devel] SPICE related features

[David Jaša]

Itamar Heim píše v Čt 09. 02. 2012 v 11:07 +0200:
> On 02/09/2012 11:05 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 02/09/2012 09:33 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
> >> On 02/09/2012 10:31 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> >>>> so this means we need to ask the user for linux guests if they want
> >>>> single head or multiple heads when they choose multi monitor?
> >>>
> >>> We could ask the user, but I don't think that that is a good idea.
> >>>
> >>>> this will cause their (single) head to spin...
> >>>
> >>> With which you seem to agree :)
> >>>
> >>>> any better UX we can suggest users?
> >>>
> >>> Yes, no UI at all, the current solution using multiple single monitor
> >>> pci cards means using Xinerama, which disables Xrandr, and thus allows
> >>> no dynamic adjustment of the monitor settings of the guest, instead
> >>> an xorg.conf file must be written (the linux agent can generate one
> >>> based on the current client monitor info) and Xorg needs to be
> >>> restarted.
> >>>
> >>> This is the result of the multiple pci cards which each 1 monitor model
> >>> we've been using for windows guests being a poor match for Linux guests.
> >>>
> >>> So we are working on adding support to drive multiple monitors from a
> >>> single qxl pci device. This requires changes on both the host and
> >>> guest side, but if both sides support it this configuration is much
> >>> better, so IMHO ovirt should just automatically enable it
> >>> if both the host (the cluster) and the guest support it.
> >>>
> >>> On the guest side, this is the current status:
> >>>
> >>> RHEL <= 6.1 no multi monitor support
> >>> RHEL 6.2(*) - 6.? multi monitor support using Xinerama (so 1
> >>> monitor/card, multiple cards)
> >>> RHEL >= 6.? multi monitor support using a single card with multiple
> >>> outputs
> >>>
> >>> Just like when exactly the new multi mon support will be available
> >>> for guests, it is a similar question mark for when it will be
> >>> available for
> >>> the host.
> >>
> >> this is the ovirt mailing list, so upstream versions are more relevant
> >> here.
> >> in any case, I have the same issue with backward compatibilty.
> >> say you fix this in fedora 17.
> >> user started a guest VM when host was fedora 16.
> >> admin upgraded host and changed cluster level to utilize new features.
> >> suddenly on next boot guest will move from 4 heads to single head? I'm
> >> guessing it will break user configuration.
> >> i.e., user should be able to choose to move to utilize the new mode?
> >
> > I see this as something which gets decided at vm creation time, and then
> > stored in the vm config. So if the vm gets created with a guest OS which
> > does not support multiple monitors per qxl device, or when the cluster does
> > not support it, it uses the old setup with 1 card / monitor. Even if the
> > guest OS or the cluster gets upgraded later.
> 
> so instead of letting user change this, we'd force this at vm creation 
> time? I'm not sure this is "friendlier".

I think that some history-watching logic & one UI bit could be the way
to go. The UI bit would be yet another select button that would let user
choose what graphic layout ("all monitors on single graphic card", "one
graphic card per monitor (legacy)"). The logic would be like this:
      * pre-existing guest that now supports new layout in 3.1 cluster
              * The guest uses 1 monitor, is swithed to 2+ --> new
              * The guest uses 2+ monitor layout --> old, big fat
                warning when changing to the new that user should wipe
                xinerama configuration in the guest
      * pre-existing guest in old or mixed cluster:
              * guest uses 2+ monitors --> old
              * guest is newly configured for 2+ monitors --> show
                warning that user either has co configure xinerama or
                use newer cluster --> old
      * new guest in new cluster:
              * --> new
              * if user switches to old, show warning
      * old guest in any type of cluster
              * --> old

This kind of behavior should provide sensible defaults, all valid
choices in all possible scenarios and it should not interfere too much
when admin chooses to do anything.

David

> ______________________________________
> _________
> Engine-devel mailing list
> Engine-devel at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel

-- 

David Jaša, RHCE

SPICE QE based in Brno
GPG Key:     22C33E24 
Fingerprint: 513A 060B D1B4 2A72 7F0D 0278 B125 CD00 22C3 3E24