[Engine-devel] Autorecovery feature plan for review

Yair Zaslavsky yzaslavs at redhat.com
Tue Feb 14 07:59:15 UTC 2012


On 02/14/2012 09:48 AM, Omer Frenkel wrote:
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Yair Zaslavsky" <yzaslavs at redhat.com>
>> To: engine-devel at ovirt.org
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 9:20:10 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Autorecovery feature plan for review
>>
>> On 02/14/2012 08:59 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
>>> On 02/14/2012 08:57 AM, Livnat Peer wrote:
>>>> On 14/02/12 05:56, Itamar Heim wrote:
>>>>> On 02/13/2012 12:32 PM, Laszlo Hornyak wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please review the plan document for autorecovery.
>>>>>> http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/Autorecovery
>>>>>
>>>>> why would we disable auto recovery by default? it sounds like the
>>>>> preferred behavior?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think that by default Laszlo meant in the upgrade process to
>>>> maintain
>>>> current behavior.
>>>>
>>>> I agree that for new entities the default should be true.
>>>
>>> i think the only combination which will allow this is for db to
>>> default
>>> to false and code to default to true for this property?
>> Why can't we during upgrade process set to all existing entities in
>> DB
>> the value to false, but still have the column defined as "default
>> true"?
> 
> why all the trouble? i think this field should be mandatory as any other field,
> user has to specify it during the entity creation, right where he provide the name and any other field for the new entity.
Fine by me.

> 
>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Engine-devel mailing list
>>> Engine-devel at ovirt.org
>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Engine-devel mailing list
>> Engine-devel at ovirt.org
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
>>




More information about the Engine-devel mailing list