[Engine-devel] Fwd: VM Payload feature

[Hugh Brock]

On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 11:54:02PM +0200, Itamar Heim wrote:
> this is intended to cover the cloud forms requirement - please
> review and make sure it is in the right direction.
> (going with floppy/iso for this version, rather than IP/injection
> which could be optional future injection methods).
> please reply on thread upstream for the discussion.
> 
> Thanks,
>    Itamar

>From the Aeolus side I don't think we have a strong opinion which way
we do this -- it's more up to the Deltacloud guys. Neither approach
requires the guest agent to be installed, right?

In any case I'm glad to see this is in the works.

Take care,
--Hugh

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [Engine-devel] VM Payload feature
> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:41:59 -0500 (EST)
> From: Oved Ourfalli <ovedo at redhat.com>
> To: engine-devel at ovirt.org
> 
> Hey all,
> 
> Continuing the discussion about Aeolus instance data injection to a
> VM (http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/engine-devel/2012-January/000423.html)
> we propose a new VM Payload feature.
> 
> The following wiki page contains a description page of the feature.
> http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/VMPayload
> 
> Please read and review.
> There are several approaches there, and we wish to head your
> opinions and thoughts about them.
> 
> Once we agree on an approach, we will start designing.
> 
> Thank you,
> Oved
> _______________________________________________
> Engine-devel mailing list
> Engine-devel at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel

-- 
== Hugh Brock, hbrock at redhat.com                                   ==
== Engineering Manager, Cloud BU                                   ==
== Aeolus Project: Manage virtual infrastructure across clouds.    ==
== http://aeolusproject.org                                        ==

"I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I’m
not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant."
--Robert McCloskey