[Engine-devel] New oVirt-engine RPMs available - Release Candidates

Dan Kenigsberg danken at redhat.com
Mon Jan 30 15:30:12 UTC 2012


On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 07:39:06AM -0500, Andrew Cathrow wrote:
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Dan Kenigsberg" <danken at redhat.com>
> > To: "Ofer Schreiber" <oschreib at redhat.com>, "Andrew Cathrow" <acathrow at redhat.com>
> > Cc: engine-devel at ovirt.org, dougsland at redhat.com
> > Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 6:58:07 AM
> > Subject: [Engine-devel] New oVirt-engine RPMs available - Release Candidates
> > 
> > <snip>
> > 
> > > 
> > > 4) VDS Bootstrap
> > > 
> > > If you check the  box for iptables then it breaks the system with
> > > an invalid rule
> > > 
> > > Looking at the error from my system
> > > "Jan 29 21:38:50 host1 iptables.init[1637]: iptables: Applying
> > > firewall rules: iptables-restore v1.4.12: physdev: option
> > > "--physdev-is-bridged" cannot be inverted."
> > > 
> > > The problem is that we are using
> > > "-A FORWARD -m physdev ! --physdev-is-bridged -j REJECT
> > > --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited"
> > > 
> > > -vs-
> > > 
> > > "-I FORWARD -m physdev --physdev-is-bridged -j ACCEPT"
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On the point of iptables, why do we open libvirt tls port and the
> > > snmp port.
> > 
> > This as these iptables rules are kept within Engine, I'll keep that
> > question for them.
> > 
> > > 
> > > After I fixed iptables I still had a problem, the host was showing
> > > as non-operational with the error message "NETWORK_UNREACHABLE"
> > > (there's a literal missing there)
> > > 
> > > Looking at the host it appears that the management bridge wasn't
> > > created.
> > > 
> > > The bootstrap log is attached. It shows the operation failing but
> > > still marked the bootstrap as successful.
> > > (also in the log we have rhn/satellite references that need to be
> > > removed)
> > > 
> > > I've not looked at the reason for the failure yet, but an empty
> > > line at the end of my ifcfg-em1 file looks suspicious.
> > 
> > You are correct (too bad I've noticed your suspicion only after
> > reading
> > the log)
> > 
> > > Sun, 29 Jan 2012 21:30:05 DEBUG    makeBridge found the following
> > > bridge paramaters: ['ONBOOT=yes', 'BOOTPROTO=none',
> > > 'IPADDR=172.16.31.230', 'DNS1=172.16.31.4', 'NM_CONTROLLED=no',
> > > 'NETMASK=255.255.255.0', 'DNS2=172.16.31.1',
> > > 'GATEWAY=172.16.31.1', '']
> > > Sun, 29 Jan 2012 21:30:05 DEBUG    ['/usr/share/vdsm/addNetwork',
> > > 'ovirtmgmt', '', '', 'em1', 'ONBOOT=yes', 'BOOTPROTO=none',
> > > 'IPADDR=172.16.31.230', 'DNS1=172.16.31.4', 'NM_CONTROLLED=no',
> > > 'NETMASK=255.255.255.0', 'DNS2=172.16.31.1',
> > > 'GATEWAY=172.16.31.1', '', 'blockingdhcp=true',
> > > 'skipLibvirt=True']
> > > Sun, 29 Jan 2012 21:30:05 DEBUG
> > > Sun, 29 Jan 2012 21:30:05 DEBUG    Traceback (most recent call
> > > last):
> > >   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/runpy.py", line 162, in
> > >   _run_module_as_main
> > >     "__main__", fname, loader, pkg_name)
> > >   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/runpy.py", line 72, in _run_code
> > >     exec code in run_globals
> > >   File "/usr/share/vdsm/configNetwork.py", line 924, in <module>
> > >     main()
> > >   File "/usr/share/vdsm/configNetwork.py", line 890, in main
> > >     kwargs = _parseKwargs(sys.argv[3:])
> > >   File "/usr/share/vdsm/configNetwork.py", line 876, in
> > >   _parseKwargs
> > >     return dict(arg.split('=', 1) for arg in args)
> > > ValueError: dictionary update sequence element #11 has length 1; 2
> > > is required
> > 
> > addNetwork script breaks down in tears if it sees the empty arg '',
> > which is passed to it by makeBridge. makeBridge should become more
> > robust - but until then, please del lines with no key=value form from
> > ifcfg.
> 
> Yeah, I did that to work around it, funnily enough vdsm adds emtpy lines when it makes it's config file!

I'm not laughing.




More information about the Engine-devel mailing list