[Engine-devel] Fwd: Problem in REST API handling/displaying of logical networks
Yaniv Kaul
ykaul at redhat.com
Tue Jul 3 07:06:56 UTC 2012
On 07/03/2012 10:00 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
> On 07/03/2012 09:51 AM, Avi Tal wrote:
> ...
>>
>> Why do we keep holding this Top level collection instead of having
>> each network related under his datacenter
>> (/api/datacenter/id/networks)???
>
> why do we keep VMs as top level? they only exist in data center...
> why do we keep Clusters as top level? they only exist in data center...
> why do we keep Templates as top level? they only exist in data center...
What's the answer to all the above, btw?
Y.
>
> all entities are available today as top level as well, so networks are
> there for consistency
>
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741111
>>
>> One solution which is must is to move the top level network
>> (/api/networks) under each Datacenter!
>>
>> 1. having top level networks path isn't symmetric to our entire REST
>> API implementation!
>> all other network collections (cluster, hosts, VMs, Templates)
>> placed under their related component.
>> 2. as a REST API user, having sub collection networks under each
>> datacenter is better to handle than parsing a top level collection
>> and comparing DC id in order to get all DC related networks.
>> 3. as for breaking api/ backward compatibility, we can still hold the
>> top level network collection ad deprecated and start exposing the sub
>> collections
>> under each datacenter.
> _______________________________________________
> Engine-devel mailing list
> Engine-devel at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
More information about the Engine-devel
mailing list