[Engine-devel] Proposed change in default port numbers

Steve Gordon sgordon at redhat.com
Tue Jul 17 18:19:01 UTC 2012


----- Original Message -----
> From: "Juan Hernandez" <jhernand at redhat.com>
> To: "Andrew Cathrow" <acathrow at redhat.com>
> Cc: engine-devel at ovirt.org
> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 3:27:02 PM
> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Proposed change in default port numbers
> 
> On 07/16/2012 09:21 PM, Andrew Cathrow wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Juan Hernandez" <jhernand at redhat.com>
> >> To: engine-devel at ovirt.org
> >> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 2:44:40 PM
> >> Subject: [Engine-devel] Proposed change in default port numbers
> >>
> >> Hello all,
> >>
> >> In change http://gerrit.ovirt.org/6348 I am proposing to change
> >> the
> >> default port numbers used by the engine, in order to avoid
> >> conflicts
> >> with the default ports used by JBoss.
> > 
> > To be clear though even if we moved to use port 6090 for http and
> > 6091 for https we'd still have 80/443 available through the
> > installer.
> 
> Correct, 80 and 443 will continue to be the default ports when using
> Apache as proxy in front of JBoss:
> 
>   80 -> 80 (no change)
>   443 -> 443 (no change)
>   8080 -> 6090
>   8443 -> 6091

This is probably a stupid question, but what are the following ports used for:

>   8009 -> 6092
>   4447 -> 6093
>   4712 -> 6094
>   4713 -> 6095

As far as I know we don't have them listed anywhere in the documentation as requiring a firewall rule to allow them, should we?

Steve



More information about the Engine-devel mailing list