[Engine-devel] Bridgeless Networks api design
Itamar Heim
iheim at redhat.com
Sun Mar 18 08:39:48 UTC 2012
On 03/18/2012 10:43 AM, Michael Pasternak wrote:
> On 03/18/2012 10:21 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
>> On 03/18/2012 09:33 AM, Michael Pasternak wrote:
>>> the question is Management/Migration/Storage/Display can be non-bridged?, if so,
>>> <bridged>true|false</bridged> makes sense.
>>
>> bridge is an implementation detail at host level, hence the discussion is about abstracting it from users.
>> a VM network doesn't have to have bridge at host level, for networks using VMFex or SR-IOV
>
> <network>
> <designation>Management|Migration|Storage|Display|VM</designation>
> </network>
>
> what do you say about having it as another /designation/ type?
>
it==VM?
the above looks ok to me.
(I really hope for a better element name than designation though)
More information about the Engine-devel
mailing list