[Engine-devel] PosixFS: GUI mock-ups have been updated

[Andrew Cathrow]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Einav Cohen" <ecohen at redhat.com>
> To: "Andrew Cathrow" <acathrow at redhat.com>
> Cc: engine-devel at ovirt.org, "Simon Grinberg" <sgrinber at redhat.com>, "Saggi Mizrahi" <smizrahi at redhat.com>, "Geert
> Jansen" <gjansen at redhat.com>, "Ori Liel" <oliel at redhat.com>, "Yair Zaslavsky" <yzaslavs at redhat.com>, "Ayal Baron"
> <abaron at redhat.com>, "Miki Kenneth" <mkenneth at redhat.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 2:05:55 PM
> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] PosixFS: GUI mock-ups have been updated
> 
> > ...
> > 
> > The important thing is that it's clear what it is - eg. the
> > remote/target not the local mount point. That could be accomplished
> > in the tool tip, etc.
> 
> So if there will be a tool-tip (or similar) in the GUI explaining
> what this field is supposed to be, are you OK with keeping the term
> "Path" (in both GUI and rest-api)?

I am , does everyone else agree.
> 
> > 
> > > Andrew/Geert/Simon/Ayal/Miki/Saggi/others: Please feel free to
> > > suggest a new term, or vote for one of the previously-discussed
> > > terms ("Remote Path" / "Path" / "Mount Spec" / "File System
> > > URI").
> > > If no decision will be made here, the term will remain as-is,
> > > i.e.
> > > "Path".
> > > 
> > ...
>