[Engine-devel] restapi: New params for import VM/Template

Michael Pasternak mpastern at redhat.com
Wed May 16 12:06:07 UTC 2012


On 05/16/2012 02:49 PM, Ori Liel wrote:
>> On 05/16/2012 01:16 PM, Gilad Chaplik wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I am adding the ability to import a VM or a Template to a storage-domain,
>>> when this VM or Template already exists in the destination storage domain.
>>> Until now, Backend failed this. Now I want to enable the user to specify
>>> that he wishes this VM/Template will be created again by a different name,
>>> i.e - cloned.
>>>
>>> [feature page: http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/ImportMoreThanOnce]
>>>
>>> I plan to achieve this using a new parameter, but I want to reach an agreement
>>> about this parameter's name. I thought simply to call it "clone".
>>>
>>> Another thing that I'll do in the patch-set is add the currently-missing ability
>>> to specify whether the snapshots of the VM, which is being imported, will
>>> be collapsed into a single snapshot (we have this ability in GUI). I am also
>>> deliberating about the name of this parameter. I thought about
>>> "collapse_snapshots" (same as in GUI).
>>>
>>> Does anyone think "clone" and "collapse_snapshots" are inappropriate and has
>>
>> /clone/ already in-use (used to clone vm from template),
>>
>> <vm>
>>  <disks>
>>    <clone>true|false</clone>
>> ...,
>>
>> you can simply say if imported vm has <name> element, this is import+clone, otherwise import,
> 
> If in the future we will want to enable overriding a VM's params on import, this will be confusing
> (because a user might want to import a VM and change it's name - but not clone it if it already exists).

the concept of /import/ is copy vm from sd1 to sd2, then you can change vm meta as needed,
besides we already using <name> element existence/absence as action 'determinator' in other
places in api.

> 
>> as about collapse_snapshots, i don't mind, but this should be done in the way <clone> is implemented
>> in <disks> collection
> 
> Semantically, a snapshot is a point in time of a VM. It not only associated any more only with the VM's
> disks; it includes the VM's meta-data as well. For this reason, maybe the parameter collapse_snapshots
> should not be in <disks> collection (although, technically, the collapse will be done on disks)

obviously i meant <snapshots>, thanks.

> 
>>
>>
>>> better suggestions?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Gilad
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Michael Pasternak
>> RedHat, ENG-Virtualization R&D


-- 

Michael Pasternak
RedHat, ENG-Virtualization R&D



More information about the Engine-devel mailing list