[Engine-devel] SSH Soft Fencing

[Eli Mesika]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Livnat Peer" <lpeer at redhat.com>
> To: "Yair Zaslavsky" <yzaslavs at redhat.com>
> Cc: engine-devel at ovirt.org
> Sent: Monday, July 1, 2013 12:57:34 PM
> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] SSH Soft Fencing
> 
> On 07/01/2013 11:27 AM, Yair Zaslavsky wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Martin Perina" <mperina at redhat.com>
> >> To: engine-devel at ovirt.org
> >> Sent: Monday, July 1, 2013 11:23:12 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] SSH Soft Fencing
> >>
> >> So let me summarize it:
> >>
> >> We have come to agreement in those questions:
> >>
> >> 1) SSH Soft Fencing logic should be extracted from
> >> VdsNotRespondingTreatment
> >>    command to its own SshSoftFencingCommand
> >>
> >> 2) VdsNotRespondingCommand should be refactored so it's not inherited from
> >>    VdsRestartCommand, but it should run SshSoftFencingCommand
> >>    or VdsRestartCommand based on defined fencing flow
> >>
> >>
> >> These questions has not been resolved yet:
> >>
> >> 3) Should SSH Soft Fencing be executed also for hosts without PM
> >> configured?
> >>
> >> 4) Should SSH Soft Fencing execution for hosts without PM configured be
> >> enabled
> >>    by default and admin can turn off these feature using configuration
> >>    options
> >>    SshSoftFencingWithoutPmEnabled (or something like that)?
> >>
> >> 5) Should SshSoftFencingWithoutPmEnabled be a global option or a cluster
> >> wide
> >>    option (can be turned off for specific cluster version) or a VDS option
> >>    (it can be turned off for each host)?
> >>
> >>
> >> Personally I would suggest:
> >>
> >>  ad 3) Yes, SSH Soft Fencing should be executed also for hosts without PM
> >>  configured
> >>
> 
> 
> +1
> 
> >>  ad 4) Yes, SSH Soft Fencing for hosts without PM configured should be
> >>  enabled by default
> >>
> 
> +1
> 
> >>  ad 5) I don't see any significant reason why someone would like to turn
> >>  off
> >>  SSH Soft Fencing
> >>        for hosts without PM configured. But if someone would like to do
> >>        that,
> >>        I think
> >>        he would like to turn it off only for specific hosts, so VDS level
> >>        option makes sense
> >>        for me
> > 
> > After re-thinking 5 - I agree.
> > +1 on the other suggestions, but of course we need to get more consensus
> > here.
> > 
> 
> I think it does not need to be configurable.


+1 on all above as well

> 
> >>
> >>
> >> Martin
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Engine-devel mailing list
> >> Engine-devel at ovirt.org
> >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Engine-devel mailing list
> > Engine-devel at ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
> > 
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Engine-devel mailing list
> Engine-devel at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
>