[Engine-devel] Tweaking backup/restore of engine and the table 'audit_log'
Yedidyah Bar David
didi at redhat.com
Mon Mar 3 20:41:14 UTC 2014
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sven Kieske" <S.Kieske at mittwald.de>
> To: engine-devel at ovirt.org
> Sent: Monday, March 3, 2014 6:25:39 PM
> Subject: [Engine-devel] Tweaking backup/restore of engine
>
> Hi,
>
> currently all events are stored in the table audit_log
> which all gets saved when you use the engine-backup
> shell script.
>
>
> the event log is full of these login lines (engine 3.3.2):
>
> 25652 fdfc627c-d875-11e0-90f0-83df133b58cc admin at internal
> 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 \N \N \N \N \N 2014-01-20
> 06:39:17.222+01 USER_VDC_LOGIN 30 0 User admin at internal
> logged in. f \N \N 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 \N \N \N
> \N 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 \N oVirt -1 30 f \N
>
> this makes the log and db grow very large when you use the REST-API
> to query ovirt for various data.
>
> Is this necessary for a working restore?
I have no idea - I guess the data is not necessary.
I also guess that the schema is.
> It would be cool if we could tweak the engine-backup
> tool to just dump necessary tables so you don't have
> to restore events from the past no one is interested
> in.
>
> How does ovirt react, if I do not restore the content of the audit_log
> table?
>
> If this works (restore without audit_log) I would prefer to have
> this code upstream in ovirt git so I don't have to maintain
> my own backupscript.
>
> Would it be possible to extend the existing backupscript
> with a switch to not backup logs?
> Currently it's just "all" or "just db".
It would be easy to let you pass an "extra options" argument for pg_dump.
This will allow adding '-T audit_log'. As I said, I am pretty certain
that you do need the table itself, so this will not help you much.
I personally think that this isn't the right way to go. If you do not need
the data, create a cron job that will periodically truncate it - say, keep
the last X days and delete the rest. Perhaps also archive before deleting
if you want. If you want, open a bug to provide a script to do that for you.
Or make the engine itself do that, etc.
Of course, after verifying that this does not have a significant impact on
the engine :-)
>
> I also recall that there shouldn't occur multiple login events any
> more since ovirt 3.3. but it still seems to be the case.
>
> I also do not understand how you would manage a stored authentication
> via REST as REST is stateless.
>
> I would appreciate any feedback or thoughts on this topic.
Best regards,
--
Didi
More information about the Engine-devel
mailing list