[Engine-devel] Small suggestions for engine-log-collector
Vojtech Szocs
vszocs at redhat.com
Wed Mar 12 11:05:48 UTC 2014
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Keith Robertson" <kroberts at redhat.com>
> To: "Vojtech Szocs" <vszocs at redhat.com>
> Cc: "engine-devel" <engine-devel at ovirt.org>, "Einav Cohen" <ecohen at redhat.com>, "Sandro Bonazzola"
> <sbonazzo at redhat.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 7:13:08 PM
> Subject: Re: Small suggestions for engine-log-collector
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Vojtech Szocs" <vszocs at redhat.com>
> > To: "engine-devel" <engine-devel at ovirt.org>
> > Cc: "Keith Robertson" <kroberts at redhat.com>, "Einav Cohen"
> > <ecohen at redhat.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 1:57:11 PM
> > Subject: Small suggestions for engine-log-collector
> >
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > based on my testing during last week's oVirt 3.4 RC test day [1],
> > I have a couple of small suggestions for engine-log-collector:
> >
> > 1, in /etc/ovirt-engine/logcollector.conf - I think there's typo:
> >
> > #key-file=/etc/pki/engine/keys/engine_id_rsa
> >
> > should be:
> >
> > #key-file=/etc/pki/ovirt-engine/keys/engine_id_rsa
> >
>
> ACK
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/25653/
>
>
> > 2, to force password-based ssh auth, one has to do this:
> >
>
> In the normal scenario, the the ovirt user's public key should be installed
> into each hypervisor. Unless something has changed as a part of the
> hypervisor registration process this should be something that we can depend
> upon.
My host was F19 VM added to oVirt Engine via WebAdmin GUI. I thought that
host deploy script should do the public key registration, though.
>
> Clearly, there are edge cases where you need to collect logs from a
> hypervisor that isn't properly registered with the RHEV-M. Was this your
> situation and how common do you think this scenario is?
It was either a misconfiguration on my part or that I skipped some step with
regard to public key registration.
>
> > engine-log-collector -k ""
> >
>
> Yes, you are nulling out the default value which causes the LC to prompt you
> for a PW. Perhaps we should document this as opposed to supplying a
> specific option? Sandro?
Well, the doc text says "If a identity file is not supplied..." which I
understood as not supplying option value (i.e. "") at all, but this was
just my understanding.
>
> > because running this:
> >
> > engine-log-collector -k
> >
> > returns error message:
> >
> > error: -k option requires an argument
> >
> > however, help for -k option mentions *supplying* the argument:
> >
> > If a identity file is not supplied the program will prompt for a
> > password.
> >
> > so either the help text should mention empty string,
> > or -k option should allow missing argument (this was
> > my initial understanding according to help text)
> >
> > Since these are just small things, I'm wondering if I should
> > create RFE or if Keith/others can say if they are relevant.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Vojtech
> >
> > [1] http://etherpad.ovirt.org/p/3.4-testday-3
> >
>
More information about the Engine-devel
mailing list