<html><body><h3>The following meeting has been modified:</h3>
<p>
<table border='0'>
<tr><th align=left>Subject:</th><td>network - UI Sync meeting </td></tr>
<tr><th align=left>Organizer:</th><td>"Roy Golan" <rgolan@redhat.com> </td></tr>
</table>
<p>
<table border='0'>
<tr><th align=left>Time:</th><td>Monday, February 27, 2012, 4:00:00 PM - 5:00:00 PM GMT +02:00 Jerusalem [MODIFIED]
</td></tr></table>
<p>
<table border='0'>
<tr><th align=left>Invitees:</th><td>mkenneth@redhat.com; sgrinber@redhat.com; lpeer@redhat.com; dfediuck@redhat.com; drankevi@redhat.com; ecohen@redhat.com; iheim@redhat.com; ovedo@redhat.com; acathrow@redhat.com; engine-devel@ovirt.org; kroberts@redhat.com ... </td></tr>
</table>
<div>*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*</div><br><br>Follow-up meeting on setup networks UI. <br>issues to follow: <br>1. can VDSM attach many non-vlan and many vlan networks to a single nic? (Dan - please reply if its doable)<br>2. if yes is the UI breakdown of vlan/non-vlan is probably not necessary? <br><br><br>open issues:<br>1.should we use "VmNetwork"? (or "allow/able to run VMs" you name it) would it be a DC or a Cluster property?<br>2.should we implicitly set bridge/bridgeless when attaching a network with setupnetworks?<br>3.nickless networks - was that planned for this version? VDSM support it already but we are missing the UI and Backend for it.<br><br><br>Bridge ID: 1814335863 <br><br>https://www.intercallonline.com/portlets/scheduling/viewNumbers/listNumbersByCode.do?confCode=1814335863 </body></html>