Fedora CI effort/Interest Group

Daniel Belenky dbelenky at redhat.com
Thu Apr 13 05:39:45 UTC 2017


Maybe we could suggest the sources of our CI system? I'm not sure It'll be
a 100% fit, but from what I've read we're already doing what they need.
This is a snippet from their demands:

   - having pagure as a front-end to dist-git
   - having a system where packager can contribute and configure tests for
   their package of interest
   - having automated testing done for each and every pull-requests
   - having automated merge of each pull-request where the set of mandatory
   tests passed
   - start of a pipeline allowing to do CI in Fedora, that we should expand
   outside of Atomic images


On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:40 PM Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com>
wrote:

> FYI
> ---------- Messaggio inoltrato ----------
> Da: "Pierre-Yves Chibon" <pingou at pingoured.fr>
> Data: 12/Apr/2017 12:52
> Oggetto: Fedora CI effort/Interest Group
> A: <devel-announce at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Cc:
>
> Dear all,
>
> A small team of people interested in working on a Continuous Integration
> has
> started looking into what it would take to add Continous Integration (CI)
> to our
> current packaging and releasing workflow.
> The current idea is to use fedora-atomic as a prototype product to port
> into
> this workflow while keeping in mind other use-cases so that we could
> eventually
> use this approach for the entire distribution (as opt-in).
>
> Since there might be more people interested than the people who expressed
> their
> interest, I invite anyone interested to join the mailing list:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ci@lists.fedoraproject.org/
> and/or
> <https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ci@lists.fedoraproject.org/%0Dand/or>
> the IRC channel: #fedora-ci on irc.freenode.net
>
> We're working to start this with as few changes to the current Fedora
> infrastructure as possible. And with a very specific set of requirements.
>
> Ultimately, I hope we can make this workflow work for not only
> fedora-atomic
> (though it is the current target) and this should help improving the
> stability
> of rawhide (and thus will also help the no-more-alpha change proposal [1]).
>
> I have put together a wiki page making this a change proposal:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FedoraAtomicCI
>
>
> Thanks for your attention and welcome aboard,
> Pierre
>
>
> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NoMoreAlpha
> _______________________________________________
> devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce at lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> devel-announce-leave at lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Infra mailing list
> Infra at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
>
-- 

DANIEL BELENKY

RHV DEVOPS

Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>

IRC: #rhev-integ #rhev-dev
<https://red.ht/sig>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/infra/attachments/20170413/3f8aedbb/attachment.html>


More information about the Infra mailing list