resources.ovirt.org directory layout is a mess
Barak Korren
bkorren at redhat.com
Tue Mar 28 11:36:58 UTC 2017
On 28 March 2017 at 14:21, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Eyal Edri <eedri at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Martin Sivak <msivak at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I just noticed we have couple of different places for the same kind of
>>> content (packages):
>>>
>>> /pub/ - includes new releases and snapshots repos
>>>
>>
>> This is the official place for oVirt releases and what any user should
>> use.
>> The official repositories
>>
>>
>>> /repos/ovirt/{experimental,tested}/ - experimental seems pretty close
>>> to snapshots
>>>
>>
>> Experimental - internal repo for CI, no one should use it.
>> Tested - official verified repos with packages that passed OST, we
>> recommend anyone to use that repo if he wants latest and greatest packages
>> and can't wait to an official release
>>
>
> If it's now official, please move it to /pub. /repos is not meant to be
> used for official public content. /repos was meant to host internal,
> development, temporary, backup repos.
>
I guess the description Eyal gave was misleading. The "official" cutting
edge releases were and remain in the nightly "snapshot" repos under "/pub".
"tested" is for use by processes that cannot wait for the nightly
publishing job and needs the latest stuff that passed OST (This means most
CI processes, but probably not user processes).
--
Barak Korren
bkorren at redhat.com
RHCE, RHCi, RHV-DevOps Team
https://ifireball.wordpress.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/infra/attachments/20170328/906b58e6/attachment.html>
More information about the Infra
mailing list