[Kimchi-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Issue #302
Aline Manera
alinefm at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Mon Mar 10 14:48:53 UTC 2014
On 03/10/2014 10:06 AM, Sheldon wrote:
> On 03/08/2014 02:13 AM, Aline Manera wrote:
>>
>> It will not work in most of cases.
> This patch is to fix #302.
>
Yeap! And I agree with it.
I am suggesting you to also edit the current network default to an
unused address - for the nested virtualization case.
For example:
# check default network exists
try:
net = networkLookupByName(default)
except:
# network default does not exist
<create network default using _get_available_address as you did in
this patch set>
# now we need to make sure the network is active
if net.isActive() == 0:
try:
net.create()
except libvirt.libvirtError, e:
# default network exists but it is using an used address
# libvir: Network Driver error : internal error Network is
already in use by interface eth0
try:
<update network address>
<activate network>
except:
cherrypy.log.error("Fatal: Cannot activate default network "
"because of %s, exit kimchid" %
e.message,
severity=logging.ERROR)
sys.exit(1)
What do you think about it?
> I just touch the the related code to create default network.
> I can works in default network missing case.
>
> As the code says, if nested kvm does not has default network, then
> kimchi can choose a network address
> and create a default network.
> If it has, then it will do not create it.
>
> I agree, we should not to send patch just for fix issue, we can
> consider more.
> actually the Issue #302 is caused by the patch fixing the Issue #22
> and Issue #56
>
> we can list all cases, and let me fixed this time.
>
>>
>> 1. The default network and storage pool is usually created by libvirt
>> with the default values.
>> So an kimchi user will face the same issue while running kimchi on
>> nested virtualization.
>> I.e, there is not way to fix it. Just warning the user about the
>> problem.
>>
>> 2. This issue is in some way related to
>> https://github.com/kimchi-project/kimchi/issues/265
>> And why should not the user delete default network/storage pool?
>> This limitation should be impose to user when a network/storage pool
>> is used by a template or vm.
>> Otherwise, the user can remove it.
>>
>> Usually the default network/storage pool is created by libvirt.
>> But some time ago, we identified it did not happen in some distros.
>> And as the Kimchi default configuration for templates is pointing to
>> those resources we decided to
>> create them manually on kimchi code to avoid problems while using the
>> templates.
>>
>> So my proposal is: let's revisit all the supported distros and check
>> if libvirt creates default
>> network/storage pool by default, and if so remove this code from kimchi.
>> Then default network/storage pool will have the same behavior from
>> other networks/storage pools.
>>
>>
>> On 03/07/2014 06:52 AM, shaohef at linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
>>> From: ShaoHe Feng <shaohef at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>
>>> let 'create' attr of networks model to create the default network
>>>
>>> ShaoHe Feng (3):
>>> move _default_network_check from top model to networks model
>>> add a new function to get an available network address
>>> Issue #302: let 'create' attr of networks model to create default
>>> network
>>>
>>> src/kimchi/model/model.py | 35 ---------------------------------
>>> src/kimchi/model/networks.py | 46
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>> src/kimchi/network.py | 7 +++++--
>>> 3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
More information about the Kimchi-devel
mailing list