[lago-devel] merge_repos is not picking the latest version of ioprocess?

[David Caro]

On 03/21 15:29, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 2:07 PM, David Caro <dcaro at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Probably.
> I'm wondering if there's any point in the merge process. Simply throwing
> all the RPMs into a single directory should be good enough for the hosts to
> take the latest greatest anyway, no?


Yes, I agree

I think that the original idea was to have a 'generic' reposync, then sync
everything, and only extract the rpms for the distros that run in the prefix to
create the internal repo, but right now we are using a custom reposync conf per
job, tailored down already.

> Y.
> 
> 
> >
> >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > lago-devel mailing list
> > > lago-devel at ovirt.org
> > > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/lago-devel
> >
> >
> > --
> > David Caro
> >
> > Red Hat S.L.
> > Continuous Integration Engineer - EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D
> >
> > Tel.: +420 532 294 605
> > Email: dcaro at redhat.com
> > IRC: dcaro|dcaroest@{freenode|oftc|redhat}
> > Web: www.redhat.com
> > RHT Global #: 82-62605
> >

-- 
David Caro

Red Hat S.L.
Continuous Integration Engineer - EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D

Tel.: +420 532 294 605
Email: dcaro at redhat.com
IRC: dcaro|dcaroest@{freenode|oftc|redhat}
Web: www.redhat.com
RHT Global #: 82-62605
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/lago-devel/attachments/20160321/1abe2c68/attachment-0001.sig>