From fabiand at redhat.com Tue Jan 7 14:16:19 2014 From: fabiand at redhat.com (Fabian Deutsch) Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 15:16:19 +0100 Subject: [node-devel] oVirt Node Weekly Meeting Minutes -- 2014-01-07 Message-ID: <1389104179.19187.0.camel@fdeutsch-laptop.local> Minutes: http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2014/ovirt.2014-01-07-14.02.html Minutes (text): http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2014/ovirt.2014-01-07-14.02.txt Log: http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2014/ovirt.2014-01-07-14.02.log.html ================================= #ovirt: oVirt Node Weekly Meeting ================================= Meeting started by fabiand__ at 14:02:38 UTC. The full logs are available at http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2014/ovirt.2014-01-07-14.02.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * Agenda (fabiand__, 14:02:51) * Build status (fabiand__, 14:03:08) * Plan for the next weeks (fabiand__, 14:03:15) * Fedora 20 port (fabiand__, 14:03:23) * Other items (fabiand__, 14:03:32) * Build status (fabiand__, 14:03:42) * Still no working iso for oVirt 3.3 (fabiand__, 14:04:39) * Plan for the next weeks (fabiand__, 14:06:47) * No build planned for this week (fabiand__, 14:08:54) * Build targeted for EO next week (fabiand__, 14:09:12) * Fedora 20 port (fabiand__, 14:09:39) * Fedora 20 got released - we need to port ovirt-node to Fedora 20 (fabiand__, 14:09:53) * AGREED: Quicker release cycle for Node (fabiand__, 14:11:27) * Fedora 20 port passes smoke testing (fabiand__, 14:12:58) * Specfile and image need a cleanup (fabiand__, 14:13:05) * Other items (fabiand__, 14:14:24) Meeting ended at 14:15:08 UTC. Action Items ------------ Action Items, by person ----------------------- * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * fabiand__ (35) * jboggs (5) * rbarry (4) * ovirtbot (3) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From fabiand at redhat.com Tue Jan 14 14:09:39 2014 From: fabiand at redhat.com (Fabian Deutsch) Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 15:09:39 +0100 Subject: [node-devel] oVirt Node Weekly Meeting Minutes -- 2014-01-14 Message-ID: <1389708579.7756.13.camel@fdeutsch-laptop.local> Minutes: http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2014/ovirt.2014-01-14-14.02.html Minutes (text): http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2014/ovirt.2014-01-14-14.02.txt Log: http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2014/ovirt.2014-01-14-14.02.log.html ================================= #ovirt: oVirt Node Weekly Meeting ================================= Meeting started by fabiand at 14:02:03 UTC. The full logs are available at http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2014/ovirt.2014-01-14-14.02.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * Agenda (fabiand, 14:02:29) * Build status (fabiand, 14:03:29) * Other items (fabiand, 14:03:40) * Build status (fabiand, 14:03:44) * fabiand did a draft build based on Fedora 19. Smoke testing is outstanding. No ETA. (fabiand, 14:04:28) * Still targeted to have a build for 3.4 Alpha at the end of this week (fabiand, 14:05:17) * Other items (fabiand, 14:06:19) Meeting ended at 14:08:29 UTC. Action Items ------------ Action Items, by person ----------------------- * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * fabiand (18) * jboggs (3) * ovirtbot (3) * rbarry (2) * bkp (2) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From fabiand at redhat.com Fri Jan 17 11:07:52 2014 From: fabiand at redhat.com (Fabian Deutsch) Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 12:07:52 +0100 Subject: [node-devel] oVirt Node ISO for oVirt 3.3 - Draft image for testing Message-ID: <1389956872.21366.7.camel@fdeutsch-laptop.local> Hey, as many of you have noticed there wasn't any well working oVirt Node ISO around for oVirt 3.3. To get this ball rolling again I've put together a draft image of ALPHA quality. It contains many fixes some of us have been working on over the last weeks. - Source & ISO - To not drown Jenkins in a hell-of-a-patch-queue I've pushed the patches to https://github.com/fabiand/ovirt-node/tree/teamsync The ISO built from that patchset can be found here: http://fedorapeople.org/~fabiand/node/3.0.4/ovirt-node-iso-3.0.3-0.999.201401170926draft.vdsm.el6.iso Please test this draft image and provide feedback on how it works for you. If you encounter problems - and you probably will - please take a look here on how to debug them: http://www.ovirt.org/Node_Troubleshooting - Important Notes - SELinux: Boot this alpha image with enforcing=0 to log potential denials, but not block the calls. To fix those denials permanently please attach your /var/log/audit/audit.log to a bug in bugzilla. Known problems: - Exception is raised after registration to Engine - Many bond devices are show on network page - Denials appear in /var/log/audit/audit.log And don't hesitate to reach out to us if you want to get more involved with Node. - fabian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From fabiand at redhat.com Fri Jan 17 20:26:44 2014 From: fabiand at redhat.com (Fabian Deutsch) Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 21:26:44 +0100 Subject: [node-devel] oVirt Node ISO for oVirt 3.3 - Draft image for testing In-Reply-To: References: <1389956872.21366.7.camel@fdeutsch-laptop.local> Message-ID: <1389990404.26506.1.camel@fdeutsch-laptop.local> Hi Laercio, Am Freitag, den 17.01.2014, 14:49 -0200 schrieb Laercio Motta: > I tested the ISO here. Thanks for being that brave! ;) > - I was able to register with the engine and aprove (thing with > 'oVirt-node-3.0.1-iso-1.0.2.vdsm.el6.iso' version was not possible) Great that this works now. > - Firewall: Being duplicated the rule of vdsm port (54321). > - 'Sanlock' is being blocked by 'selinux' (audit.log attached) Okay, those are probably bugs we need to take care of. > - NIC was messy .. :P (eth0, eth4, eth5, eth6... ).. Could you explain this a bit more? Did all NICs appear, or did to many NICs appear? Thanks fabian > > > > 2014/1/17 Fabian Deutsch > Hey, > > as many of you have noticed there wasn't any well working > oVirt Node ISO > around for oVirt 3.3. > To get this ball rolling again I've put together a draft image > of ALPHA > quality. It contains many fixes some of us have been working > on over the > last weeks. > > - Source & ISO - > To not drown Jenkins in a hell-of-a-patch-queue I've pushed > the patches to > > https://github.com/fabiand/ovirt-node/tree/teamsync > > The ISO built from that patchset can be found here: > > http://fedorapeople.org/~fabiand/node/3.0.4/ovirt-node-iso-3.0.3-0.999.201401170926draft.vdsm.el6.iso > > Please test this draft image and provide feedback on how it > works for > you. > If you encounter problems - and you probably will - please > take a look > here on how to debug them: > > http://www.ovirt.org/Node_Troubleshooting > > - Important Notes - > SELinux: Boot this alpha image with enforcing=0 to log > potential > denials, but not block the calls. To fix those denials > permanently > please attach your /var/log/audit/audit.log to a bug in > bugzilla. > > Known problems: > - Exception is raised after registration to Engine > - Many bond devices are show on network page > - Denials appear in /var/log/audit/audit.log > > > And don't hesitate to reach out to us if you want to get more > involved > with Node. > > - fabian > > > > -- > ???????????????????????????????????????????????? > ???????????? Laercio da Silva Motta ???????????? > ?----------------------------------------------? > ? Blog: http://www.laerciomotta.com/ ? > ? Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/laerciomasala ? > ? Skype: laerciomasala ? > ? Chave PGP: http://bit.ly/kXS6ga ? > ??????????????????????????????????????????v1.0?? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From fabiand at redhat.com Mon Jan 20 15:15:44 2014 From: fabiand at redhat.com (Fabian Deutsch) Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 16:15:44 +0100 Subject: [node-devel] oVirt Node ISO for oVirt 3.3 - Draft image for testing In-Reply-To: References: <1389956872.21366.7.camel@fdeutsch-laptop.local> <1389990404.26506.1.camel@fdeutsch-laptop.local> Message-ID: <1390230944.24277.6.camel@fdeutsch-laptop.local> Am Montag, den 20.01.2014, 13:10 -0200 schrieb Laercio Motta: > Understand?? o.0 Hey Laercio, sorry for the delay. I think I do understand the problem: The NIC order is different the previously, right? When you configure a NIC you cna use the button to identify a special NIC. We won't change this on el6 - but the Feora based Node should be using predictable network names, which is addressing this issue. - fabian > > > 2014/1/17 Laercio Motta > Hi, > > > > Could you explain this a bit more? > > Did all NICs appear, or did to many NICs appear? > > > I'm used to udev leave my NIC in sequence. > And in this case it got messed up: > common: > eth0 -> port 1 > eth1 -> port 2 > ethx >> port X > > What happened: > eth0 -> port 1 > eth4 -> port 3 > eth5 -> port 4 > eth6 -> port 2 > > As follows attached file .. > > Not a big problem .. But it confused me a little time to > configure the network of 'nodes' ... Had to use tcpdump > (thankfully that was available) to find out which interface > belonged to what port Switch for CDP: P > > > > > 2014/1/17 Fabian Deutsch > Hi Laercio, > > Am Freitag, den 17.01.2014, 14:49 -0200 schrieb > Laercio Motta: > > > I tested the ISO here. > > > Thanks for being that brave! ;) > > > - I was able to register with the engine and aprove > (thing with > > 'oVirt-node-3.0.1-iso-1.0.2.vdsm.el6.iso' version > was not possible) > > > Great that this works now. > > > - Firewall: Being duplicated the rule of vdsm port > (54321). > > - 'Sanlock' is being blocked by 'selinux' (audit.log > attached) > > > Okay, those are probably bugs we need to take care of. > > > - NIC was messy .. :P (eth0, eth4, eth5, eth6... ).. > > > Could you explain this a bit more? > Did all NICs appear, or did to many NICs appear? > > Thanks > fabian > > > > > > > > > 2014/1/17 Fabian Deutsch > > Hey, > > > > as many of you have noticed there wasn't any > well working > > oVirt Node ISO > > around for oVirt 3.3. > > To get this ball rolling again I've put > together a draft image > > of ALPHA > > quality. It contains many fixes some of us > have been working > > on over the > > last weeks. > > > > - Source & ISO - > > To not drown Jenkins in a > hell-of-a-patch-queue I've pushed > > the patches to > > > > > https://github.com/fabiand/ovirt-node/tree/teamsync > > > > The ISO built from that patchset can be > found here: > > > > > http://fedorapeople.org/~fabiand/node/3.0.4/ovirt-node-iso-3.0.3-0.999.201401170926draft.vdsm.el6.iso > > > > Please test this draft image and provide > feedback on how it > > works for > > you. > > If you encounter problems - and you probably > will - please > > take a look > > here on how to debug them: > > > > http://www.ovirt.org/Node_Troubleshooting > > > > - Important Notes - > > SELinux: Boot this alpha image with > enforcing=0 to log > > potential > > denials, but not block the calls. To fix > those denials > > permanently > > please attach your /var/log/audit/audit.log > to a bug in > > bugzilla. > > > > Known problems: > > - Exception is raised after registration to > Engine > > - Many bond devices are show on network page > > - Denials appear in /var/log/audit/audit.log > > > > > > And don't hesitate to reach out to us if you > want to get more > > involved > > with Node. > > > > - fabian > > > > > > > > -- > > ???????????????????????????????????????????????? > > ???????????? Laercio da Silva Motta ???????????? > > ?----------------------------------------------? > > ? Blog: http://www.laerciomotta.com/ ? > > ? Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/laerciomasala ? > > ? Skype: laerciomasala ? > > ? Chave PGP: http://bit.ly/kXS6ga ? > > ??????????????????????????????????????????v1.0?? > > > > > > -- > ???????????????????????????????????????????????? > ???????????? Laercio da Silva Motta ???????????? > ?----------------------------------------------? > ? Blog: http://www.laerciomotta.com/ ? > ? Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/laerciomasala ? > ? Skype: laerciomasala ? > ? Chave PGP: http://bit.ly/kXS6ga ? > ??????????????????????????????????????????v1.0?? > > > > -- > ???????????????????????????????????????????????? > ???????????? Laercio da Silva Motta ???????????? > ?----------------------------------------------? > ? Blog: http://www.laerciomotta.com/ ? > ? Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/laerciomasala ? > ? Skype: laerciomasala ? > ? Chave PGP: http://bit.ly/kXS6ga ? > ??????????????????????????????????????????v1.0?? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From fabiand at redhat.com Tue Jan 21 14:56:49 2014 From: fabiand at redhat.com (Fabian Deutsch) Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 15:56:49 +0100 Subject: [node-devel] oVirt Node Weekly Meeting Minutes -- 2014-01-21 Message-ID: <1390316209.9142.7.camel@fdeutsch-laptop.local> Minutes: http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2014/ovirt.2014-01-21-14.20.html Minutes (text): http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2014/ovirt.2014-01-21-14.20.txt Log: http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2014/ovirt.2014-01-21-14.20.log.html ================================= #ovirt: oVirt Node Weekly Meeting ================================= Meeting started by fabiand at 14:20:55 UTC. The full logs are available at http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2014/ovirt.2014-01-21-14.20.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * Agenda (fabiand, 14:21:27) * Build status (fabiand, 14:21:44) * oVirt 3.4 Beta (fabiand, 14:21:56) * Other items (fabiand, 14:22:19) * LINK: https://github.com/fabiand/ovirt-node/tree/teamsync (fabiand, 14:29:08) * fabiand upstreamed many pending patches to https://github.com/fabiand/ovirt-node/tree/teamsync (fabiand, 14:29:59) * fabiand build draft ISO from pending patches: http://fedorapeople.org/~fabiand/node/3.0.4/ovirt-node-iso-3.0.3-0.999.201401200947draft.vdsm,checkpolicy,make.el6.iso (fabiand, 14:30:29) * ACTION: rbarry and jboggs to smoke test draft ISO (fabiand, 14:32:22) * ACTION: fabiand to merge patchset if passes smoke testing (fabiand, 14:32:32) * LINK: http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/22398/ (jboggs, 14:35:24) * jboggs made progress on migrating storage disocvery to blivet: http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/22398/ (fabiand, 14:36:31) * Build status (fabiand, 14:38:33) * Build based on upstreamed patchset ready for review (fabiand, 14:38:57) * LINK: http://fedorapeople.org/~fabiand/node/3.0.4/ovirt-node-iso-3.0.3-0.999.201401200947draft.vdsm,checkpolicy,make.el6.iso (fabiand, 14:38:58) * Build / Patches can be base for 3.3 and 3.4 image (fabiand, 14:39:14) * oVirt 3.4 (fabiand, 14:39:22) * LINK: http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.4_release_management (fabiand, 14:40:48) * LINK: http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.4_Test_Day (fabiand, 14:40:52) * fabiand to prepare image for 3.4 test day (fabiand, 14:41:29) * Other Items (fabiand, 14:43:28) Meeting ended at 14:52:29 UTC. Action Items ------------ * rbarry and jboggs to smoke test draft ISO * fabiand to merge patchset if passes smoke testing Action Items, by person ----------------------- * fabiand * fabiand to merge patchset if passes smoke testing * jboggs * rbarry and jboggs to smoke test draft ISO * rbarry * rbarry and jboggs to smoke test draft ISO * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * fabiand (60) * jboggs (8) * rbarry (6) * ovirtbot (3) * alonbl (2) * danken (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From laerciomasala at gmail.com Fri Jan 17 16:49:29 2014 From: laerciomasala at gmail.com (Laercio Motta) Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 14:49:29 -0200 Subject: [node-devel] oVirt Node ISO for oVirt 3.3 - Draft image for testing In-Reply-To: <1389956872.21366.7.camel@fdeutsch-laptop.local> References: <1389956872.21366.7.camel@fdeutsch-laptop.local> Message-ID: Hi... I tested the ISO here. - I was able to register with the engine and aprove (thing with 'oVirt-node- 3.0.1-iso-1.0.2.vdsm.el6.iso' version was not possible) - Firewall: Being duplicated the rule of vdsm port (54321). - 'Sanlock' is being blocked by 'selinux' (audit.log attached) - NIC was messy .. :P (eth0, eth4, eth5, eth6... ).. 2014/1/17 Fabian Deutsch > Hey, > > as many of you have noticed there wasn't any well working oVirt Node ISO > around for oVirt 3.3. > To get this ball rolling again I've put together a draft image of ALPHA > quality. It contains many fixes some of us have been working on over the > last weeks. > > - Source & ISO - > To not drown Jenkins in a hell-of-a-patch-queue I've pushed the patches to > > https://github.com/fabiand/ovirt-node/tree/teamsync > > The ISO built from that patchset can be found here: > > > http://fedorapeople.org/~fabiand/node/3.0.4/ovirt-node-iso-3.0.3-0.999.201401170926draft.vdsm.el6.iso > > Please test this draft image and provide feedback on how it works for > you. > If you encounter problems - and you probably will - please take a look > here on how to debug them: > > http://www.ovirt.org/Node_Troubleshooting > > - Important Notes - > SELinux: Boot this alpha image with enforcing=0 to log potential > denials, but not block the calls. To fix those denials permanently > please attach your /var/log/audit/audit.log to a bug in bugzilla. > > Known problems: > - Exception is raised after registration to Engine > - Many bond devices are show on network page > - Denials appear in /var/log/audit/audit.log > > > And don't hesitate to reach out to us if you want to get more involved > with Node. > > - fabian > -- ???????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????? Laercio da Silva Motta ???????????? ?----------------------------------------------? ?* Blog: *http://www.laerciomotta.com/ ? ? *Twitter:* http://twitter.com/#!/laerciomasala ? ? *Skype*: laerciomasala ? ? Chave PGP: http://bit.ly/kXS6ga ? ??????????????????????????????????????????v1.0?? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: audit.log Type: text/x-log Size: 491621 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: iptables Type: application/octet-stream Size: 1027 bytes Desc: not available URL: From laerciomasala at gmail.com Fri Jan 17 23:01:07 2014 From: laerciomasala at gmail.com (Laercio Motta) Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 21:01:07 -0200 Subject: [node-devel] oVirt Node ISO for oVirt 3.3 - Draft image for testing In-Reply-To: <1389990404.26506.1.camel@fdeutsch-laptop.local> References: <1389956872.21366.7.camel@fdeutsch-laptop.local> <1389990404.26506.1.camel@fdeutsch-laptop.local> Message-ID: Hi, > Could you explain this a bit more? > Did all NICs appear, or did to many NICs appear? I'm used to udev leave my NIC in sequence. And in this case it got messed up: common: eth0 -> port 1 eth1 -> port 2 ethx >> port X What happened: eth0 -> port 1 eth4 -> port 3 eth5 -> port 4 eth6 -> port 2 As follows attached file .. Not a big problem .. But it confused me a little time to configure the network of 'nodes' ... Had to use tcpdump (thankfully that was available) to find out which interface belonged to what port Switch for CDP: P 2014/1/17 Fabian Deutsch > Hi Laercio, > > Am Freitag, den 17.01.2014, 14:49 -0200 schrieb Laercio Motta: > > > I tested the ISO here. > > Thanks for being that brave! ;) > > > - I was able to register with the engine and aprove (thing with > > 'oVirt-node-3.0.1-iso-1.0.2.vdsm.el6.iso' version was not possible) > > Great that this works now. > > > - Firewall: Being duplicated the rule of vdsm port (54321). > > - 'Sanlock' is being blocked by 'selinux' (audit.log attached) > > Okay, those are probably bugs we need to take care of. > > > - NIC was messy .. :P (eth0, eth4, eth5, eth6... ).. > > Could you explain this a bit more? > Did all NICs appear, or did to many NICs appear? > > Thanks > fabian > > > > > > > > > 2014/1/17 Fabian Deutsch > > Hey, > > > > as many of you have noticed there wasn't any well working > > oVirt Node ISO > > around for oVirt 3.3. > > To get this ball rolling again I've put together a draft image > > of ALPHA > > quality. It contains many fixes some of us have been working > > on over the > > last weeks. > > > > - Source & ISO - > > To not drown Jenkins in a hell-of-a-patch-queue I've pushed > > the patches to > > > > https://github.com/fabiand/ovirt-node/tree/teamsync > > > > The ISO built from that patchset can be found here: > > > > > http://fedorapeople.org/~fabiand/node/3.0.4/ovirt-node-iso-3.0.3-0.999.201401170926draft.vdsm.el6.iso > > > > Please test this draft image and provide feedback on how it > > works for > > you. > > If you encounter problems - and you probably will - please > > take a look > > here on how to debug them: > > > > http://www.ovirt.org/Node_Troubleshooting > > > > - Important Notes - > > SELinux: Boot this alpha image with enforcing=0 to log > > potential > > denials, but not block the calls. To fix those denials > > permanently > > please attach your /var/log/audit/audit.log to a bug in > > bugzilla. > > > > Known problems: > > - Exception is raised after registration to Engine > > - Many bond devices are show on network page > > - Denials appear in /var/log/audit/audit.log > > > > > > And don't hesitate to reach out to us if you want to get more > > involved > > with Node. > > > > - fabian > > > > > > > > -- > > ???????????????????????????????????????????????? > > ???????????? Laercio da Silva Motta ???????????? > > ?----------------------------------------------? > > ? Blog: http://www.laerciomotta.com/ ? > > ? Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/laerciomasala ? > > ? Skype: laerciomasala ? > > ? Chave PGP: http://bit.ly/kXS6ga ? > > ??????????????????????????????????????????v1.0?? > > -- ???????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????? Laercio da Silva Motta ???????????? ?----------------------------------------------? ?* Blog: *http://www.laerciomotta.com/ ? ? *Twitter:* http://twitter.com/#!/laerciomasala ? ? *Skype*: laerciomasala ? ? Chave PGP: http://bit.ly/kXS6ga ? ??????????????????????????????????????????v1.0?? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 70-persistent-net.rules Type: application/octet-stream Size: 1536 bytes Desc: not available URL: From laerciomasala at gmail.com Mon Jan 20 15:10:10 2014 From: laerciomasala at gmail.com (Laercio Motta) Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 13:10:10 -0200 Subject: [node-devel] oVirt Node ISO for oVirt 3.3 - Draft image for testing In-Reply-To: References: <1389956872.21366.7.camel@fdeutsch-laptop.local> <1389990404.26506.1.camel@fdeutsch-laptop.local> Message-ID: Understand?? o.0 2014/1/17 Laercio Motta > Hi, > > > > Could you explain this a bit more? > > Did all NICs appear, or did to many NICs appear? > > I'm used to udev leave my NIC in sequence. > And in this case it got messed up: > common: > eth0 -> port 1 > eth1 -> port 2 > ethx >> port X > > What happened: > eth0 -> port 1 > eth4 -> port 3 > eth5 -> port 4 > eth6 -> port 2 > > As follows attached file .. > > Not a big problem .. But it confused me a little time to configure the > network of 'nodes' ... Had to use tcpdump (thankfully that was available) > to find out which interface belonged to what port Switch for CDP: P > > > > 2014/1/17 Fabian Deutsch > >> Hi Laercio, >> >> Am Freitag, den 17.01.2014, 14:49 -0200 schrieb Laercio Motta: >> >> > I tested the ISO here. >> >> Thanks for being that brave! ;) >> >> > - I was able to register with the engine and aprove (thing with >> > 'oVirt-node-3.0.1-iso-1.0.2.vdsm.el6.iso' version was not possible) >> >> Great that this works now. >> >> > - Firewall: Being duplicated the rule of vdsm port (54321). >> > - 'Sanlock' is being blocked by 'selinux' (audit.log attached) >> >> Okay, those are probably bugs we need to take care of. >> >> > - NIC was messy .. :P (eth0, eth4, eth5, eth6... ).. >> >> Could you explain this a bit more? >> Did all NICs appear, or did to many NICs appear? >> >> Thanks >> fabian >> >> > >> > >> > >> > 2014/1/17 Fabian Deutsch >> > Hey, >> > >> > as many of you have noticed there wasn't any well working >> > oVirt Node ISO >> > around for oVirt 3.3. >> > To get this ball rolling again I've put together a draft image >> > of ALPHA >> > quality. It contains many fixes some of us have been working >> > on over the >> > last weeks. >> > >> > - Source & ISO - >> > To not drown Jenkins in a hell-of-a-patch-queue I've pushed >> > the patches to >> > >> > https://github.com/fabiand/ovirt-node/tree/teamsync >> > >> > The ISO built from that patchset can be found here: >> > >> > >> http://fedorapeople.org/~fabiand/node/3.0.4/ovirt-node-iso-3.0.3-0.999.201401170926draft.vdsm.el6.iso >> > >> > Please test this draft image and provide feedback on how it >> > works for >> > you. >> > If you encounter problems - and you probably will - please >> > take a look >> > here on how to debug them: >> > >> > http://www.ovirt.org/Node_Troubleshooting >> > >> > - Important Notes - >> > SELinux: Boot this alpha image with enforcing=0 to log >> > potential >> > denials, but not block the calls. To fix those denials >> > permanently >> > please attach your /var/log/audit/audit.log to a bug in >> > bugzilla. >> > >> > Known problems: >> > - Exception is raised after registration to Engine >> > - Many bond devices are show on network page >> > - Denials appear in /var/log/audit/audit.log >> > >> > >> > And don't hesitate to reach out to us if you want to get more >> > involved >> > with Node. >> > >> > - fabian >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > ???????????????????????????????????????????????? >> > ???????????? Laercio da Silva Motta ???????????? >> > ?----------------------------------------------? >> > ? Blog: http://www.laerciomotta.com/ ? >> > ? Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/laerciomasala ? >> > ? Skype: laerciomasala ? >> > ? Chave PGP: http://bit.ly/kXS6ga ? >> > ??????????????????????????????????????????v1.0?? >> >> > > > -- > ???????????????????????????????????????????????? > ???????????? Laercio da Silva Motta ???????????? > ?----------------------------------------------? > ?* Blog: *http://www.laerciomotta.com/ ? > ? *Twitter:* http://twitter.com/#!/laerciomasala ? > ? *Skype*: laerciomasala ? > ? Chave PGP: http://bit.ly/kXS6ga ? > ??????????????????????????????????????????v1.0?? > -- ???????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????? Laercio da Silva Motta ???????????? ?----------------------------------------------? ?* Blog: *http://www.laerciomotta.com/ ? ? *Twitter:* http://twitter.com/#!/laerciomasala ? ? *Skype*: laerciomasala ? ? Chave PGP: http://bit.ly/kXS6ga ? ??????????????????????????????????????????v1.0?? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From laerciomasala at gmail.com Mon Jan 20 15:49:05 2014 From: laerciomasala at gmail.com (Laercio Motta) Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 13:49:05 -0200 Subject: [node-devel] oVirt Node ISO for oVirt 3.3 - Draft image for testing In-Reply-To: <1390230944.24277.6.camel@fdeutsch-laptop.local> References: <1389956872.21366.7.camel@fdeutsch-laptop.local> <1389990404.26506.1.camel@fdeutsch-laptop.local> <1390230944.24277.6.camel@fdeutsch-laptop.local> Message-ID: No problem. But I believe this is because the file already has something. Or he's duplicating information. As you can see in the file I sent, the MAC of NIC and eth1 eth6 are the same .. Well, we stayed anyway: P 2014/1/20 Fabian Deutsch > Am Montag, den 20.01.2014, 13:10 -0200 schrieb Laercio Motta: > > Understand?? o.0 > > Hey Laercio, > > sorry for the delay. > I think I do understand the problem: The NIC order is different the > previously, right? > > When you configure a NIC you cna use the button > to identify a special NIC. > > We won't change this on el6 - but the Feora based Node should be using > predictable network names, which is addressing this issue. > > - fabian > > > > > > > 2014/1/17 Laercio Motta > > Hi, > > > > > > > Could you explain this a bit more? > > > Did all NICs appear, or did to many NICs appear? > > > > > > I'm used to udev leave my NIC in sequence. > > And in this case it got messed up: > > common: > > eth0 -> port 1 > > eth1 -> port 2 > > ethx >> port X > > > > What happened: > > eth0 -> port 1 > > eth4 -> port 3 > > eth5 -> port 4 > > eth6 -> port 2 > > > > As follows attached file .. > > > > Not a big problem .. But it confused me a little time to > > configure the network of 'nodes' ... Had to use tcpdump > > (thankfully that was available) to find out which interface > > belonged to what port Switch for CDP: P > > > > > > > > > > 2014/1/17 Fabian Deutsch > > Hi Laercio, > > > > Am Freitag, den 17.01.2014, 14:49 -0200 schrieb > > Laercio Motta: > > > > > I tested the ISO here. > > > > > > Thanks for being that brave! ;) > > > > > - I was able to register with the engine and aprove > > (thing with > > > 'oVirt-node-3.0.1-iso-1.0.2.vdsm.el6.iso' version > > was not possible) > > > > > > Great that this works now. > > > > > - Firewall: Being duplicated the rule of vdsm port > > (54321). > > > - 'Sanlock' is being blocked by 'selinux' (audit.log > > attached) > > > > > > Okay, those are probably bugs we need to take care of. > > > > > - NIC was messy .. :P (eth0, eth4, eth5, eth6... ).. > > > > > > Could you explain this a bit more? > > Did all NICs appear, or did to many NICs appear? > > > > Thanks > > fabian > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2014/1/17 Fabian Deutsch > > > Hey, > > > > > > as many of you have noticed there wasn't any > > well working > > > oVirt Node ISO > > > around for oVirt 3.3. > > > To get this ball rolling again I've put > > together a draft image > > > of ALPHA > > > quality. It contains many fixes some of us > > have been working > > > on over the > > > last weeks. > > > > > > - Source & ISO - > > > To not drown Jenkins in a > > hell-of-a-patch-queue I've pushed > > > the patches to > > > > > > > > https://github.com/fabiand/ovirt-node/tree/teamsync > > > > > > The ISO built from that patchset can be > > found here: > > > > > > > > > http://fedorapeople.org/~fabiand/node/3.0.4/ovirt-node-iso-3.0.3-0.999.201401170926draft.vdsm.el6.iso > > > > > > Please test this draft image and provide > > feedback on how it > > > works for > > > you. > > > If you encounter problems - and you probably > > will - please > > > take a look > > > here on how to debug them: > > > > > > http://www.ovirt.org/Node_Troubleshooting > > > > > > - Important Notes - > > > SELinux: Boot this alpha image with > > enforcing=0 to log > > > potential > > > denials, but not block the calls. To fix > > those denials > > > permanently > > > please attach your /var/log/audit/audit.log > > to a bug in > > > bugzilla. > > > > > > Known problems: > > > - Exception is raised after registration to > > Engine > > > - Many bond devices are show on network page > > > - Denials appear in /var/log/audit/audit.log > > > > > > > > > And don't hesitate to reach out to us if you > > want to get more > > > involved > > > with Node. > > > > > > - fabian > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > ???????????????????????????????????????????????? > > > ???????????? Laercio da Silva Motta ???????????? > > > ?----------------------------------------------? > > > ? Blog: http://www.laerciomotta.com/ ? > > > ? Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/laerciomasala ? > > > ? Skype: laerciomasala ? > > > ? Chave PGP: http://bit.ly/kXS6ga ? > > > ??????????????????????????????????????????v1.0?? > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > ???????????????????????????????????????????????? > > ???????????? Laercio da Silva Motta ???????????? > > ?----------------------------------------------? > > ? Blog: http://www.laerciomotta.com/ ? > > ? Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/laerciomasala ? > > ? Skype: laerciomasala ? > > ? Chave PGP: http://bit.ly/kXS6ga ? > > ??????????????????????????????????????????v1.0?? > > > > > > > > -- > > ???????????????????????????????????????????????? > > ???????????? Laercio da Silva Motta ???????????? > > ?----------------------------------------------? > > ? Blog: http://www.laerciomotta.com/ ? > > ? Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/laerciomasala ? > > ? Skype: laerciomasala ? > > ? Chave PGP: http://bit.ly/kXS6ga ? > > ??????????????????????????????????????????v1.0?? > > -- ???????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????? Laercio da Silva Motta ???????????? ?----------------------------------------------? ?* Blog: *http://www.laerciomotta.com/ ? ? *Twitter:* http://twitter.com/#!/laerciomasala ? ? *Skype*: laerciomasala ? ? Chave PGP: http://bit.ly/kXS6ga ? ??????????????????????????????????????????v1.0?? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From fabiand at redhat.com Thu Jan 23 16:17:27 2014 From: fabiand at redhat.com (Fabian Deutsch) Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 17:17:27 +0100 Subject: [node-devel] [ANN] Second oVirt Node ISO for oVirt 3.4 Test Day Message-ID: <1390493847.24344.14.camel@fdeutsch-laptop.local> Hey, we've updated the oVirt Node iso: http://fedorapeople.org/~fabiand/node/3.0.4/ovirt-node-iso-3.0.3-0.999.201401231512draft.vdsm.el6.iso This updated contains fixes for this two problems: Bug 1057050 - manual instalation screen freezes at 75% Bug 1057064 - ovirt-node cannot be added as a host from TUI Additional that iso should raise less SELinux denials and can possibly without appending enforcing=0. As always: feedback is always appreciated. - fabian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From keweihk at gmail.com Sat Jan 25 02:23:58 2014 From: keweihk at gmail.com (Kewei Yu) Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 10:23:58 +0800 Subject: [node-devel] [Users] The machine type of one cluster Message-ID: Hi all: There is a "machine type" in cluster, It will decide which machine of Qemu will be used, When we add the first host into cluster, a default machine type is shown. We can correct the DB's value of the engine to set the machine type. I just want to know how dose cluster choice the default machine? It is decided by VDSM? Qemu? or It is only fixed value in engine's DB? Regard Kewei -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From iheim at redhat.com Sat Jan 25 21:44:30 2014 From: iheim at redhat.com (Itamar Heim) Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 23:44:30 +0200 Subject: [node-devel] [vdsm] [Users] The machine type of one cluster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <52E4303E.4010208@redhat.com> On 01/25/2014 04:23 AM, Kewei Yu wrote: > Hi all: > There is a "machine type" in cluster, It will decide which machine > of Qemu will be used, When we add the first host into cluster, a default > machine type is shown. We can correct the DB's value of the engine to > set the machine type. > I just want to know how dose cluster choice the default machine? It > is decided by VDSM? Qemu? or It is only fixed value in engine's DB? > > Regard > Kewei > > > _______________________________________________ > vdsm-devel mailing list > vdsm-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel > basically, for fedora its 'pc', which may have some live migration issues between different versions in the same cluster. for .el6, its 'rhel63/rhel64/rhel65/etc.', which is a stable definition of emulation mode for the cluster (i.e., even a .el7 host should live migrate to .el6 if we specify its emulation mode as rhel65, etc.) engine defines per cluster level the expected emulation mode. vdsm reports from libvirt from qemu, so engine can check the host is a match. if the first host in the cluster is fedora, it will be set to 'pc', if its .el6, it will be set to the 'rhelxx' option. From keweihk at gmail.com Sun Jan 26 02:33:19 2014 From: keweihk at gmail.com (Kewei Yu) Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 10:33:19 +0800 Subject: [node-devel] [vdsm] [Users] The machine type of one cluster In-Reply-To: <52E4303E.4010208@redhat.com> References: <52E4303E.4010208@redhat.com> Message-ID: 2014/1/26 Itamar Heim > On 01/25/2014 04:23 AM, Kewei Yu wrote: > >> Hi all: >> There is a "machine type" in cluster, It will decide which machine >> of Qemu will be used, When we add the first host into cluster, a default >> machine type is shown. We can correct the DB's value of the engine to >> set the machine type. >> I just want to know how dose cluster choice the default machine? It >> is decided by VDSM? Qemu? or It is only fixed value in engine's DB? >> >> Regard >> Kewei >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> vdsm-devel mailing list >> vdsm-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org >> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel >> >> > basically, for fedora its 'pc', which may have some live migration issues > between different versions in the same cluster. > for .el6, its 'rhel63/rhel64/rhel65/etc.', which is a stable definition of > emulation mode for the cluster (i.e., even a .el7 host should live migrate > to .el6 if we specify its emulation mode as rhel65, etc.) > > engine defines per cluster level the expected emulation mode. > vdsm reports from libvirt from qemu, so engine can check the host is a > match. > if the first host in the cluster is fedora, it will be set to 'pc', if its > .el6, it will be set to the 'rhelxx' option. > Thanks for your answer, It is helpful to me. Regard Kewei -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From fabiand at redhat.com Mon Jan 27 12:38:41 2014 From: fabiand at redhat.com (Fabian Deutsch) Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:38:41 +0100 Subject: [node-devel] oVirt Node 3.0.4 stable preparations and TestDay summary Message-ID: <1390826321.8923.11.camel@fdeutsch-laptop.local> Hey, as discussed on last weeks Node meeting we build a draft image based upon the following out-of-gerrit branch: https://github.com/fabiand/ovirt-node/tree/teamsync There were quite many testers. At least five I know of. Three bigger bugs came up and got fixed on the TestDay: Bug 1057050 - manual instalation screen freezes at 75% Bug 1057064 - ovirt-node cannot be added as a host from TUI (unfiled) - The SELinux module wasn't loaded correctly One was discovered to be resolved: Bug 1032228 - TUI installations fails to pass keyboard page In general many users were capable of registering the node to Engine and launch VMs. There is one bug where a user is still struggling to register to Engine: Bug 1057088 - ovirt-node cannot be added as a host from webUI As an exception I'll now be merging the patch queue into our stable (node-3.0) branch and backport all missing patches to the master branch. - fabian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: