oVirt comminuty voting
Jim Jagielski
jimjag at redhat.com
Tue Sep 13 15:12:44 UTC 2011
http://webmink.com/2011/03/11/is-apache-open-by-rule/
On Sep 13, 2011, at 11:06 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 09/13/2011 08:54 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> A project lead implies that somehow his/her vote is more important
>> than anyone else's, which is not how the ASF works.
>>
>> The idea is to build a community that strives for consensus so that
>> the need for tie-breaking votes isn't required…
>
> That's one model, but it's not the only model. As it happens, there's a good LWN article right now on this topic.
>
> http://lwn.net/Articles/458094/
>
> The simple fact is, a large part of the ecosystem we're trying to build is already existing and has a diverse development model. If we don't accommodate development model diversity, then we're going to exclude large parts of the ecosystem which is going to result in fragmentation.
>
> Regards,
>
> Anthony Liguori
>
>> If half the community
>> thinks A and the other B, then there is for sure no consensus.
>>
>>>
>>> Having 3 maintainers does not mean there isn't an overall project leader. We have around 30 maintainers in QEMU but only one project leader. The project leader casts the tie breaking vote.
>>>
>>> It's the same model as the kernel and many other communities.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Anthony Liguori
>>
>> --
>> Jim Jagielski | jimjag at redhat.com | 443-324-8390 (cell)
>>
>
--
Jim Jagielski | jimjag at redhat.com | 443-324-8390 (cell)
More information about the Project-planning
mailing list