[Users] Add NIC directly to VM (Dedicated)
Itamar Heim
iheim at redhat.com
Fri Feb 15 01:53:44 EST 2013
On 10/02/2013 18:07, Matt . wrote:
> Here: http://www.mail-archive.com/users@ovirt.org/msg06261.html
>
>
> 2013/2/10 Shahar Havivi <shaharh at redhat.com <mailto:shaharh at redhat.com>>
>
> On 10.02.13 16:36, Matt . wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm thinking about the way how I did that with the dedicated NIC
> to the VM.
> > I was discussing this a couple of months ago on IRC but I can't
> remeber and
> > I already tried to do this... no luck yet. I remember that the
> NICS were
> > just available when adding a nic to the VM, by MAC-address. Can't
> figure it
> > out yet what I did those except of not sleeping that much :)
> I don't remember that, sorry...
> >
> > About the error that I get I do the following:
> >
> >
> > Hosts > Network Interfaces > Setup Host Networks.
> >
> > When I drag a network I created to a NIC and I don't set an IP or
> DHCP or
> > None I get that error: "Error while executing action Setup Networks:
> > Illegal or Incomplete IP Address"
> >
> > When I set and IP to that network that is draaged to the Nic I
> don't get an
> > error, but why only and IP and no GW as this is IP seems to be
> bridged in
> > the host to the VM where you add a Nic to with that same network
> you just
> > gave an IP.
> >
> > When saying the above, could have been possible that I have set the
> > Mac-Address of the real Nic @ the VM Nic ? As this is possible
> that might
> > have been the solution I used ?
> >
> > For the rest this software is good and the support is superb!
> I can't reproduce this error,
> its look like UI validation...
> Alona,Moti did you encounter this error?
>
> >
> > Thanks so far again.
> >
> > Matt
> >
> >
> > 2013/2/10 Shahar Havivi <shaharh at redhat.com
> <mailto:shaharh at redhat.com>>
> >
> > > On 10.02.13 16:16, Matt . wrote:
> > > > Hi Shahar,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks, I need to work this out further to have it 100% visible.
> > > >
> > > > I wonder why I was able in the past (3.1) to dedicate an NIC
> to a VM.
> > > >
> > > > Do you also have an explanation why I cannot save a network
> configuration
> > > > with a nic in DHCP mode ? It complains about a wrong IP and I
> have seen
> > > it
> > > > should be a bug. Is this right ?
> > > How did you that...
> > > I.e can you tell me the steps that you made in the UI? (for
> both cases)
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > >
> > > > Matt
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2013/2/10 Shahar Havivi <shaharh at redhat.com
> <mailto:shaharh at redhat.com>>
> > > >
> > > > > On 10.02.13 14:13, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> > > > > > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 12:19:57PM +0100, Matt . wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > For setting up a firewall in a VM I would like to add 2
> of my 4
> > > nics
> > > > > > > directly to a VM.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > In my previous setup I thought I have done that, but at
> the moment
> > > I
> > > > > cannot
> > > > > > > figure this out and cannot find the docs to accomplish
> this.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I would like to dedicate those 2 nics to my firewall
> VM's to avoid
> > > > > sharing
> > > > > > > them using a network per accident to other VM's.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > How is this be done at the moment ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > AFAIK it can be done only with a vdsm hook. You'd need to
> define
> > > your VM
> > > > > > with no interface at all, but instead, mark it with a
> special custom
> > > > > > property you define. Then, you should write a hook that
> adds the two
> > > > > > host interfaces to the VM, by means of either
> > > > > > http://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#elementsNICSDirect or
> > > > > > http://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#elementsNICSHostdev
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Most probably, you would need to pin your firewall VM to
> a specific
> > > > > > host.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Writing a hook is not too complex, but it requires
> understanding of
> > > how
> > > > > > vdsm and libvirt works. You can take
> > > > > >
> http://gerrit.ovirt.org/gitweb?p=vdsm.git;a=tree;f=vdsm_hooks/vmfexas a
> > > > > > reference, or ask for specific guidance here.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Dan.
> > > > > Dan is right,
> > > > > Currently you can do it via hook,
> > > > > We do have promisc mode but currently we have mirroring
> mode only (ie
> > > you
> > > > > can
> > > > > monitor each VM traffic but cannot intercept it).
> > > > > The way to do it is via layer 2.
> > > > >
> > > > > its best to implement after_vm_start hook and use ebtables.
> > > > > you can pass to the hook the network name.
> > > > > when you have the network name you can prob for its mac
> address and in
> > > the
> > > > > libvirt xml
> > > > > you can view the interfaces that are part of that network
> and get the
> > > mac
> > > > > addresses as well. (look at other hooks as Dan point out)
> > > > >
> > > > > when you have the network name the network mac and the target
> > > interface you
> > > > > can use ebtables:
> > > > > 1. set the bridge in promisc mode
> > > > > $ ifconfig <netwok name> promisc
> > > > > 2. traffic to the monitoring machine
> > > > > $ ebtables -t nat -A PREROUTING -d 00:1a:4a:16:01:51 -i
> eth0 -j dnat
> > > > > --to-destination 00:1a:4a:16:01:11
> > > > > 3. traffic from the monitoring machine
> > > > > $ ebtables -t nat -A PREROUTING -s 00:1a:4a:16:01:51 -i
> vnet0 -j
> > > dnat
> > > > > --to-destination 00:1a:4a:16:01:11
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. set the network interface in promiscous mode
> > > > > 2. traffic that ment to the vm mac will go to the
> destination mac
> > > > > 2. traffic that sent from the vm mac will go to the
> destination mac
> > > > >
> > > > > note that the -i <interface> is the interface name and I
> think it can
> > > be
> > > > > omitted...
> > > > >
> > > > > Shahar Havivi.
> > > > >
> > >
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
why do you need to attach the nics directly to the guest, rather than
use logical network A/B. this VM will have a vnic for A and a vnic for
B. the all guests "behind" the firewall would all be on logical network B?
More information about the Users
mailing list