[Users] Will migration succeed between two different CPU?

[lofyer]

On 2013/7/2 20:46, Roy Golan wrote:
> On Tue 02 Jul 2013 03:29:47 PM IDT, lofyer wrote:
>> On 2013/7/2 20:15, Roy Golan wrote:
>>> On Tue 02 Jul 2013 03:09:08 PM IDT, lofyer wrote:
>>>> On 2013/7/2 19:58, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 1:17 PM, lofyer wrote:
>>>>>> On 2013/7/2 19:06, Roy Golan wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue 02 Jul 2013 12:48:44 PM IDT, lofyer wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2013/7/2 17:07, Roy Golan wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Tue 02 Jul 2013 12:00:12 PM IDT, lofyer wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Will migration succeed between two different CPU?
>>>>>>>>>> Suppose node A is Core-i5, node B is Xeon e5405.
>>>>>> Unfortunately no, I'll paste log file later.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I think you have to choose the "lowest" level of cpu type of your
>>>>> hosts for your cluster cpu type...
>>>>> What is now thsi cpu type?
>>>>> Gianluca
>>>> "Lowest" cpu level? Is there a list of cpu priority?
>>>> For now the cluster cpu type is Nehalem, there is an Core-i5 node and
>>>> Xeon node in it.
>>>
>>> This is already enforced by the cluster so if there was a problem
>>> cpu-wise you would see it.
>>> Nehalem is lower then the SandyBridge (this is sorted out in the
>>> drop-down)
>>>
>>> bottom line we need the log.
>>>
>> OK, I see. I would paste the log file in a few hours(the Core-i5 nodes
>> has been shutdown by my friend..)
>> So, the priority is AMD G5 > G4 > ... > Intel Haswell > .. Conroe
>> family ?
>> Unless G5 node migrate VM initiatively, it would be impossible to
>> migrate VM from G5 node to others?
>
> The cluster name (the family) sets all VM's CPUs to be virtualized as 
> Nehalem. The Corei5 extra instruction-set are not being used and 
> that's how we
> ensure a migration between hosts.
>
Thank you all. The migration following the rule works fine.