[Users] Fedora upgrading from 3.1 to 3.2

Itamar Heim iheim at redhat.com
Sat Jun 22 15:19:41 UTC 2013


On 06/22/2013 02:43 PM, Karli Sjöberg wrote:
> Hi Itamar!
>
>> I think another consideration here is with the issues around upgrades
>> with fedora (which breaks itself during upgrade), if recommending to
>> deploy on .el6[1] (RHEL/CentOS/etc.) platforms wouldn't be better.
>>
>> [1] until other platforms are added - ubuntu is starting to look close.
>
> So that Fedora can be the testingbed that it was designed to be; yes I think so to. But there have been issues going from CentOS-6.3- to 6.4 with oVirt as well, no? I mean, isn´t upgrading issues something that needs dealing with sooner rather than later, regardless of the distribution? Or are "we" hoping for that much better maintainability between CentOS-6.X and oVirt-3.X that they can live alongside of each other throughout their respective lifespan?
>
> There weren´t any "official" packages for CentOS when we set up our platform, otherwise we would have probably chosen CentOS right from start, for that increased stability. But is there any commitment from your side to continue supporting oVirt on CentOS, or is it going to continue being more or less a "one-man show"? (No offense to Dreyou, keep up the good work, awesome job so far)
>
> Best Regards
> Karli Sjöberg
>
>
> ,.øfifi÷
>

Dreyou can only be commended for the work he did for .el6 support.
and to your question - yes - .el6 has been officially added to oVirt and 
will remain maintained.



More information about the Users mailing list